Systematic Literature Review Benefits the Professional Development of Undergraduate Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56103/nactaj.v67i1.97Keywords:
undergraduate, motivation, confidence, professional development, literature reviewAbstract
The value of systematic literature review and research synthesis for the professional development of undergraduate students is largely unknown. As such, opportunities to develop these skills may be underutilized by educators. Using quantitative and qualitative methods we assessed how participation in research synthesis improved the professional development of undergraduate students in ecology. We found improvements in motivation to pursue careers in ecology and self-confidence, which are two key aspects of professional development. Systematic literature review and research synthesis are critical skills for success in environmental sciences, yet opportunities to develop these skills may be scarce. Developing these important skills imparts significant benefits to the professional development of undergraduate students, and educators should not hesitate to offer opportunities based on these skills.
Downloads
References
AAAS. (2011). Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Educaiton, A Call to Action.
Akinyode, B. F., & Khan, T. H. (2018). Step by step approach for qualitative data analysis. International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability, 5(3), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.11113/ijbes.v5.n3.267
Auker, L. A., & Barthelmess, E. L. (2020). Teaching R in the undergraduate ecology classroom : approaches , lessons learned , and recommendations. Ecosphere, 11((4)). https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3060
Brownell, S. E., Price, J. V, & Steinman, L. (2012). A writing-intensive course improves biology undergraduates ’ perception and confidence of their abilities to read scientific literature and communicate science. Advances in Physiology Education, 37, 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00138.2012
Cromley, J. G., Perez, T., & Kaplan, A. (2015). Undergraduate STEM Achievement and Retention: Cognitive, Motivational, and Institutional Factors and Solutions. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215622648
Gray, F. E., Emerson, L., & MacKay, B. (2005). Meeting the demands of the workplace: Science students and written skills. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(4), 425–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-005-8087-y
Grinnell College, & Lopatto, D. (2009). CURE post-course survey, annotated. https://www.grinnell.edu/sites/default/files/documents/CURE%20post-survey%20copy%20annotated.pdf
Hernandez, P. R., Bloodhart, B., Barnes, R. T., Adams, A. S., Clinton, S. M., Pollack, I., Godfrey, E., Burt, M., & Fischer, E. V. (2017). Promoting professional identity, motivation, and persistence: Benefits of an informal mentoring program for female undergraduate students. PLoS ONE, 12(11), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187531
Hunter, A., Laursen, S. L., & Seymour, E. (2006). Becoming a Scientist : The Role of Undergraduate Research in Students ’ Cognitive , Personal , and Professional Development. Science Education, 91, 36–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce
Kardash, C. A. M. (2000). Evaluation of an undergraduate research experience: Perceptions of undergraduate interns and their faculty mentors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.191
Keown, D. (1984). Let’s Justify the Field Trip. National Association of Biology Teachers, 46(1), 43–48.
Koricheva, J., Gurevitch, J., Mengersen, K. (2013). Handbook of Meta-Analysis in Ecology and Evolution. Princeton University Press.
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A Revision of Bloom ’ s Taxonomy : An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212–219. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104
Lei, S. a. (2010). Field Trips in College Biology and Ecology Courses: Revisiting Benefits and Drawbacks. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 37, 42–48. http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA224405377&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=fulltext&issn=00941956&p=AONE&sw=w
Lester, J. N., Cho, Y., & Lochmiller, C. R. (2020). Learning to Do Qualitative Data Analysis: A Starting Point. Human Resource Development Review, 19(1), 94–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484320903890
Likert, R. (1932). A TECHNIQUE FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF ATTITUDES. Archives of Psychology, 22, 5–55.
Lopatto, D. (2010). Undergraduate Research as a High-Impact Student Experience. Peer Review, 12(2), 27–30. http://content.ebscohost.com/ContentServer.asp?T=P&P=AN&K=52225829&S=R&D=a9h&EbscoContent=dGJyMMvl7ESeqK84yNfsOLCmr0uep7BSs6y4S7WWxWXS&ContentCustomer=dGJyMPGpt0mwrLdQuePfgeyx44Dt6fIA%5Cnhttp://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=52225829&site=ehost-live&scope=cite
McLaughlin, J., Patel, M., Johnson, D. K., & De la Rosa, C. L. (2018). The Impact of a Short-Term Study Abroad Program that Offers a Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience and Conservation Activities. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 30(3), 100–118. https://doi.org/10.36366/frontiers.v30i3.424
Monroe, M. C. (2012). The Co-Evolution of ESD and EE. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 6(1), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/097340821100600110
Monroe, M. C., Adams, A. E., & Greenaway, A. (2019). Considering research paradigms in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 25(3), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2019.1610863
Motz, B. A., Quick, J. D., Wernert, J. A., & Miles, T. A. (2021). A pandemic of busywork: Increased online coursework following the transition to remote instruction is associated with reduced academic achievement. Online Learning Journal, 25(1), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i1.2475
Nicholson, L., Putwain, D., Connors, L., & Hornby-Atkinson, P. (2013). The key to successful achievement as an undergraduate student: Confidence and realistic expectations? Studies in Higher Education, 38(2), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.585710
R Core Team (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austira. URL https://www.R-project.org/.
Resasco, J. (2013). Field-based and hands-on ecology lab increase undergraduate interest in the natural world. Journal of Natural History Education and Experience, 7, 22–25.
Robnett, R. D., Chemers, M. M., & Zurbriggen, E. L. (2015). Longitudinal associations among undergraduates’ research experience, self-efficacy, and identity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(6), 847–867. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21221
Simmons, M. E., Wu, X. B., Knight, S. L., & Lopez, R. R. (2008). Assessing the Influence of Field- and GIS-based Inquiry on Student Attitude and Conceptual Knowledge in an Undergraduate Ecology Lab. Life Sciences Education, 7(3), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.07
Switzer, P. V. (1995). Campus field trips: an effective supplement to classroom instruction. Journal of College Science Teaching, XXV(January), 140–143.
Wofford, A. M. (2021). Modeling the Pathways to Self-Confidence for Graduate School in Computing. In Research in Higher Education (Vol. 62, Issue 3). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-020-09605-9
Young, A. M., Wendel, P. J., Esson, J. M., & Plank, K. M. (2018). Motivational decline and recovery in higher education STEM courses. International Journal of Science Education, 40(9), 1016–1033. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1460773
