Rapport, Course Technology, and Self-Regulated Learning as Predictors of Student Satisfaction in an Online Horticulture Program
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56103/nactaj.v66i1.9Keywords:
Online Teaching, Student Satisfaction, HorticultureAbstract
Online courses have proliferated in higher education, which has provided greater opportunities for institutions and students. However, student attrition from online programs has been a perennial problem. One potential solution to help increase retention is to improve student satisfaction. Instructor characteristics, technology, and self-regulated learning are all variables, which could contribute to greater student satisfaction in online courses. However, little research exists regarding these variables within the context of online agriculture programs. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine predictors of student satisfaction in an online, multi-institutional, horticulture program. Students enrolled in the ACCEPtS horticulture program in spring and fall of 2020 were surveyed to determine their perceptions regarding professor-student rapport, technology, self-regulated learning, and course satisfaction. Results showed that students had favorable perceptions regarding professor-student rapport and technology, they mostly agreed they used self-regulated learning behaviors, and they were generally satisfied with the ACCEPtS program. Technology and professor-student rapport were significant predictors of student satisfaction; however, rapport was more robust and explained about a quarter of the variance in satisfaction. Rapport is an important contributor to student satisfaction in online courses, and instructors should utilize behaviors that contribute to the building of relationships.
Downloads
References
Adzharuddin, N.A., & Ling, L.H. (2013). Learning management system (LMS) among university students: Does it work? International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, 3(3), 248-252. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJEEEE.2013.V3.233
Alston, A.J., & English, C.W. (2007). Technology enhanced agricultural education learning environments: An assessment of student perceptions. Journal of Agricultural Education, 48(4), 1-10.
Angelino, L.M., Williams, F.K., & Natvig, D. (2007). Strategies to engage online students and reduce attrition rates. The Journal of Educators Online, 4(2), 1-14.
Artino, A.R. (2007). Online military training: Using a social cognitive view of motivation and self-regulation to understand students’ satisfaction, perceived learning and choice. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(3), 191-202.
Barnard, L., Lan, W.Y., To, Y.M., Paton, V.O., & Lai, S.L. (2008). Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments. Internet and Higher Education, 12(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.005
Barnard-Brak, L., Paton, V.O., & Lan, W.Y. (2010). Profiles in self-regulated learning in the online learning environment. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 11(1), 61-80. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v11i1.769
Bolliger, D.U., & Martindale, T. (2004). Key factors for determining student satisfaction in online courses. International Journal on E-Learning, 3(1), 61-67.
Burbuah, B., Drape, T., & Westfall-Rudd, D. (2014). A descriptive account of factors affecting student satisfaction in an online master’s degree in agriculture and life sciences. NACTA Journal, 58(4), 341-348.
Chumbley, S.B., Haynes, J.C., Hainline, M.S., & Sorenson, T. (2018). A measure of self-regulated learning in online agriculture courses. Journal of Agricultural Education, 59(1), 153-170. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2018.01153
Chung, C.H., Pasquini, L.A., & Koh, C.E. (2013). Web-based learning management system considerations for higher education. Learning and Performance Quarterly 1(4), 24-37.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Davis, J.A. (1971). Elementary survey analysis. Prentice-Hall.
Dillman, D.A., Smyth, J.D., & Christian, L.M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). Wiley.
Dunkin, M.J., & Biddle, B.J. (1974). The study of teaching. University Press of America.
Estepp, C.M. (2012). The relationships among teacher immediacy, professor/student rapport, and self-regulated learning (Publication No. 3569614). [Doctoral dissertation, University of Florida]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Estepp, C.M., & Roberts, T.G. (2013). Exploring the relationship between professor/student rapport and students’ expectancy for success and values/goals in college of agriculture classrooms. Journal of Agricultural Education, 54(4), 180-194. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2013.04180
Evans, M.R., Harkess, R., Kuehny, J., & Cole, J. (2011). ACCEPtS: An alliance for cooperative course sharing in the plant sciences. HortTechnology, 21(6), 696-697.
Field, A. & Miles, J. (2012). Discovering statistics using SAS. Sage Publications, Ltd.
Glazier, R.A. (2016). Building rapport to improve retention and success in online classes. Journal of Political Science Education, 12(4), 437-456. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2016.1155994
Hoch, W.A., & Dougher, T.A.O. (2011). Student perceptions of hybrid vs. traditional courses: A case study in plant identification. NACTA Journal, 55(4), 8-15.
Jayaratne, K.S.U., & Moore, G. (2017). Perceptions of college students toward online classes: Implications for teaching online. NACTA Journal, 61(4), 304-309.
Joo, Y.J., Joung, S., & Kim, J. (2014). Structural relationships among self-regulated learning, learning flow, satisfaction, and learning persistence in cyber universities. Interactive learning environments, 22(6), 752-770. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2012.745421
Kebritchi, M., Lipscheutz, A., & Santiague, L. (2017). Issues and challenges for teaching successful online courses in higher education: A literature review. Journal of Educational Technology, 46, 4-29.
Kuo, Y.C. (2010). Interaction, internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in distance education courses. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Utah State University.
Lammers, W.J., & Gillaspy Jr., J.A. (2013). Brief measure of student-instructor rapport predicts student success in online courses. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning, 7(2), Article 16. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2013.070216
Lin, C.H., Zhang, Y., & Zheng, B. (2017). The roles of learning strategies and motivation in online language learning: A structural equation modeling analysis. Computers and Education, 113, 75-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.05.014
Lowman, J. (1995). Mastering the techniques of teaching (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Mackinnon, A. (2010). The use and reporting of multiple imputation in medical research – a review. Journal of Internal Medicine, 268, 586–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2796.2010.02274.x
Manly, C.A., & Wells, R.S. (2015). Reporting the use of multiple imputation for missing data in higher education research. Research in Higher Education, 56, 397-409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-014-9344-9
Martin, F., & Bolliger, D.U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205-222. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092
Meyers, S.A. (2009). Do your students care whether you care about them?. College Teaching, 57(4), 205-210.
Murphrey, T.P., Arnold, S., Foster, B., & Degenhart, S.H. (2012). Verbal immediacy and audio/video technology use in online course delivery: What do university agricultural education students think?. Journal of Agricultural Education, 53(3), 14-27. https://doi.org/10.5031/jae.2012.03014
Neu, A.E., Stern, M.D., & Martinson, K.L. (2017). Undergraduate student learning gains and satisfaction in online and in-person animal science courses. Natural Sciences Education, 46(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.4195/nse2017.02.0003
Pintrich, P.R., & Zusho, A. (2007). Student motivation and self-regulated learning in the college classroom. In R.P. Perry & J.C. Smart (Eds.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective (pp. 731-810). Springer.
Puzziferro, M. (2006). Online technologies self-efficacy, self-regulated learning, and experiential variables as predictors of final grade and satisfaction in college-level online courses (Publication No. 3199984). [Doctoral dissertation, New York University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Rhoades, E.B., Irani, T., Tingor, M.B., Wilson, S.B., Kubota, C, Giacomelli, G., & McMahon, M.J. (2009). A case study of horticultural education in a virtual world: A web-based multimedia approach. NACTA Journal, 53(4), 42-48.
Roberts, T.G., & Dyer, J.E. (2005). The relationship of self-efficacy, motivation, and critical thinking disposition to achievement and attitudes where an illustrated web lecture is used in an online learning environment. Journal of Agricultural Education, 46(2), 12-23.
Salant, P., & Dillman D.A. (1994). How to conduct your own survey. John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Schafer, J.L. (1999). Multiple imputation: A primer. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 8(1), 3-15.
Sciarappa, W.J., Quinn, V., & Ward, D.L. (2016). Comparing conventional, hybrid, and distance learning courses in horticulture. HortTechnology, 26(5), 677-682. https://doi.org/10.21273/horttech03377-16
Seaman, J.E., Allen, I.E., & Seaman, J. (2018). Grade increase: Tracking distance education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group.
Sivo, A.S., Ku, C.H., & Acharya, P. (2018). Understanding how university student perceptions of resources affect technology acceptance in online learning courses. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 72-91. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2806
Soffer, T., & Cohen, A. (2019). Students’ engagement characteristics predict success and completion of online courses. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35, 378-389. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12340
Song, L. Singleton, E.S., Hill, J.R., & Myung, H.K. (2004). Improving online learning: Student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. Internet and Higher Education, 7, 59-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2003.11.003
Strong, R., Irby, T.L., Wynn, T.J., & McClure, M.M. (2012). Investigating students’ satisfaction with elearning courses: The effect of learning environment and social presence. Journal of Agricultural Education, 53(3), 98-110. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2012.03098
Swafford, M. (2018). The relationship between motivation and online self-regulated learning. Journal of Human Sciences and Extension, 6(3), 92-106.
VanDerZanden, A.M., & Woline, T. (2008). Student perceptions of an online introductory horticulture course. NACTA Journal, 52(1), 33-37.
Wells, M.I. (2007). Dreams deferred but not deterred: A qualitative study on undergraduate nursing student attrition. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice, 8(4), 439-456. https://doi.org/10.2190/17K2-5847-6637-L70P
Wilson, J.H., Ryan, R.G., & Pugh, J.L. (2010). Professor-student rapport scale predicts student outcomes. Teaching of Psychology, 37(4), 246-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986283.2010.510976
Woline, T., & VanDerZanden, A.M. (2011). Student perceptions of problem-solving skills and evaluation of a web-based environment for case-study work in landscape horticulture. HortTech, 20(4), 820-824. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.20.4.820
Yalcin, Y. (2017). Online learners’ satisfaction: Investigating the structural relationships among self-regulation, self-efficacy, task value, learning design, and perceived learning (Publication No. 10637957). [Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Yuan (2011). Multiple imputation using SAS software. Journal of Statistical Software, 45(6), 1-25.
