The Implementation of Inquiry-Based Learning Activities in an Introductory Animal Science Course
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56103/nactaj.v66i1.66Keywords:
Inquiry-Based Learning, Interest, Motivation, EngagementAbstract
Inquiry-based learning (IBL), a student-centered teaching technique, prompts students’ initiative in self-guided learning and problem-solving. IBL promotes engagement through higher-order thinking, collaboration, and creativity. This study examines the impact of IBL levels on students’ interest, motivation, and engagement. Three levels of IBL (traditional, structured, and guided) were implemented in an introductory animal science laboratory session at three time points during the Fall 2021 semester. Students were divided among five laboratory sessions and then randomly divided into six groups using a Latin square arrangement. During each time point, students completed 20-minute case scenario activities utilizing one of three IBL levels. Inquiry levels were differentiated by the instruction, information, and supplies provided to students. At each time point, students self-reported their situational interest, motivation, and engagement on a Likert scale. Across all IBL levels, students experienced high levels of attention demand, identified regulation, and personal effort and no differences were seen between IBL levels. Although limited to one course, our findings suggest that IBL activities promote interest, engagement, and motivation, which could generate long-term student engagement and investment in course content. Future research should juxtapose inquiry-based learning and traditional teaching methods to further examine the impacts in additional formats and subjects.
Downloads
References
Abdelkader, A. M., Amin, N. M., & Almefarfesh, A. (2019). The Relationship Between Learner-Centered Teaching and Learning Motivation among Nursing Students in Minia University. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 9(10), 42. https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v9n10p42
Al-Ismaily, S. S., Kacimov, A. R., Al-Maktoumi, A. K., & Al-Busaidi, H. A. (2018). Progressing from Direct Instruction to Structured and Open Inquiry-Based Teaching in a Bachelor of Soil Sciences Program: Experience at the National University in Oman. Journal of Geoscience Education, 67(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2018.1509571
Anwar, Y. A. S. (2020). The Multilevel Inquiry Approach to Achieving Meaningful Learning in
Biochemistry Course. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 48(1), 28-37.
doi:10.1002/bmb.21309
Artayasa, I Putu & Susilo, Herawati & Lestari, Umie & Indriwati, Sri Endah. (2017). The
Effectiveness of the Three Levels of Inquiry in Improving Teacher Training Students’ Science Process Skills. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(6), 908.
Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The Effects of Instructors' Autonomy Support and Students'
Autonomous Motivation on Learning Organic Chemistry: A Self‐Determination Theory
Perspective. Science Education, 84(6), 740-756.
Berg, C. A. R., Bergendahl, V. C. B., Lundberg, B., & Tibell, L. (2003). Benefiting from an
Open-Ended Experiment? A Comparison of Attitudes to, and Outcomes of, an Expository
versus an Open-inquiry Version of the Same Experiment. International Journal of Science Education, 25(3), 351-372.
Bunterm, T., Lee, K., Ng Lan Kong, J., Srikoon, S., Vangpoomyai, P., Rattanavongsa, J., &
Rachahoon, G. (2014). Do Different Levels of Inquiry Lead to Different Learning
Outcomes? A Comparison between Guided and Structured Inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 36(12), 1937-1959.
Caswell, C. J., & LaBrie, D. J. (2017). Inquiry Based Learning from the Learner’s Point of View:
A Teacher Candidate’s Success Story. Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, 7(2), 161-
Chaudhary, Z., & Lam, G. (2021). Embracing the Unexpected: Using Troubleshooting to
Modulate Structured- to Open-inquiry and Self-regulated Learning in a First-year Virtual Lab. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA).
https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.vi0.14905
Chapman E (2003). Alternative Approaches to Assessing Student Engagement Rates. Practical
Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 8, 1-10.
Chen, A., Darst, P. W., & Pangrazi, R. P. (1999). What Constitutes Situational Interest?
Validating a Construct in Physical Education. Measurement in Physical Education and
Exercise Science, 3(3), 157-180.
Chi, M. T., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking Cognitive Engagement to Active
Learning Outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219-243.
Corpus, J. H., Wormington, S. V., & Haimovitz, K. (2016). Creating Rich Portraits: A Mixed
Methods Approach to Understanding Profiles of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations. The
Elementary School Journal, 116(3), 365-390.
Cresswell, S. L., & Loughlin, W. A. (2017). A Case-based Scenario with Interdisciplinary
Guided Inquiry in Chemistry and Biology: Experiences of First Year Forensic Science Students. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(8), 1074–1082.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00827
Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J., & Blanchard, C. (2000). On the Assessment of Situational Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: The Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS). Motivation and Emotion, 24(3), 175-213.
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The Four-Phase Model of Interest Development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111-127.
Hyland, D., Van Kampen, P., & Nolan, B. (2021). Introducing Direction Fields to Students
Learning Ordinary Differential Equations (ODEs) through Guided Inquiry. International
Journal of Mathematical Education in Science & Technology, 52(3), 331–348.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1670367
Jocz, J. A., Zhai, J., & Tan, A. L. (2014). Inquiry Learning in the Singaporean Context: Factors
Affecting Student Interest in School Science. International Journal of Science Education,
(15), 2596-2618.
KeenGwe, J., OnChwari, G., & OnChwari, J. (2009). Technology and Student Learning:
Towards a Learner Centered teaching model. AACE Review (formerly AACE Journal), 17(1), 11-22.
Keselman, A. (2003). Supporting Inquiry Learning by Promoting Normative Understanding of
Multivariable Causality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(9), 898-921.
Lederman, J. S. (2009). Levels of Inquiry and the 5 E’s Learning Cycle Model. Monterey, CA:
National Geographic School Publishing. Web:
http://www.ngspscience.com/profdev/monographs/SCL22-0407A_SCI_AM_Lederman_FP.pdf. Accessed on May 26, 2022.
Linneberg, M. S., & Korsgaard, S. (2019). Coding Qualitative Data: A Synthesis Guiding the
Novice. Qualitative Research Journal, 19(3), 259-270.
Panasan, M., & Nuangchalerm, P. (2010). Learning Outcomes of Project-based and
Inquiry-based Learning Activities. Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), 252-255.
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., De Jong, T., Van Riesen, S. A., Kamp, E. T., ... &
Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of Inquiry-based Learning: Definitions and the Inquiry
Cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47-61.
Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2017). Interest Development: Arousing Situational Interest
Affects the Growth Trajectory of Individual Interest. Contemporary Educational
Psychology, 49, 175-184.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation from a Self-determination Theory Perspective: Definitions, Theory, Practices, and Future Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860.
Sadeh, I., & Zion, M. (2009). The Development of Dynamic Inquiry Performances within an
Open Inquiry Setting: A Comparison to Guided Inquiry Setting. Journal of Research in
Science Teaching, 46(10), 1137–1160. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20310
Sadeh, I., & Zion, M. (2011) Which Type of Inquiry Project Do High School Biology Students
Prefer: Open or Guided?. Research in Science Education, 42(5), 1-18.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011
Schiefele, U. (2009). Situational and individual interest. In K. R. Wenzel & A. Wigfield
(Eds.), Educational Psychology Handbook Series. Handbook of Motivation at School (pp. 197–222). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Senyigit, Ç., Önder, F., & Silay, I. (2021). An Inquiry-Based Learning Approach for Effective
Concept Teaching. Ie: Inquiry in Education, 13(1), 10.
Spronken-Smith, R. (2012). Experiencing the Process of Knowledge Creation: The Nature and
Use of Inquiry-based Learning in Higher Education. In International Colloquium on Practices for Academic Inquiry. University of Otago (pp. 1-17).
Wang, P. H., Wu, P. L., Yu, K. W., & Lin, Y. X. (2015). Influence of Implementing Inquiry-based Instruction on Science Learning Motivation and Interest: A Perspective of Comparison. Procedia-social and Behavioral sciences, 174, 1292-1299.
Wiggins, B. L., Eddy, S. L., Wener-Fligner, L., Freisem, K., Grunspan, D. Z., Theobald, E. J., Timbrook, J., & Crowe, A. J. (2017). Aspect: A Survey to Assess Student Perspective of Engagement in an Active-Learning Classroom. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-08-0244
Wright, G. B. (2011). Student-centered Learning in Higher Education. International Journal of
Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23(1), 92-97.
