Impact of Teacher Self-Efficacy on Elementary STEM-Based Agricultural Curriculum


  • Elizabeth Simmermeyer Purdue University
  • Gregory Fraley Purdue University
  • Sarah LaRose Purdue University
  • Elizabeth Karcher Purdue University



agriculture, curriculum, teacher self-efficacy


            Teachers may be hesitant to implement STEM-based agriculture programs due to their perceived low self-efficacy in the subject area. More deliberate professional development resources for educators can be refined by understanding how their beliefs impact students’ learning and interest. The objective of this study was to determine how teachers’ previous knowledge and self-efficacy in agriculture impacted student interest in the turkey industry. Four hundred eighty-two students enrolled in the POULT program across 23 [STATE] classrooms (17 teachers) in the fall of 2021. Students completed the program (online modules, interactive notebook, and class project) over six consecutive school days. Student situational interest was measured two times throughout the program. Teacher self-efficacy, previous agricultural experience, and knowledge of turkey industry were assessed at the start of the program (70.59% response rate). Teachers showed low self-efficacy in poultry content knowledge and high self-efficacy in engagement. Their agriculture experience positively increased their self-efficacy to motivate students to learn about turkey production. Additionally, teachers’ instructional self-efficacy impacted students’ situational interest. Overall, teachers found the program to be a positive way to engage students in agriculture. However, time commitments and technology issues may prevent them from implementing the program again in the future.


Download data is not yet available.


Articulate Global, LLC. New York, NY.

Avery, L., & Meyer, D. (2012). Teaching science as science is practiced: opportunities and limits for enhancing preservice elementary teachers' self-efficacy for science and science teaching. School Science and Mathematics, 112(7) 395-409.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.

Beardsley, M., Albo, L., & Aragon, P. (2021). Emergency education effects on teacher abilities and motivation to use digital technologies. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1455-1477.

Brightspace. D2L Corporation. Kitchener, ON, Canada.

Bruce, D. L. & Chiu, M. M. (2015). Composing with new technology: teacher reflections on learning digital video. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(3) 272-287.

Burke, A. (2011). Group work: how to use groups effectively. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 11(2), 2011, 87-95.

Dev, P. C. (1997). Intrinsic motivation and academic achievement: what does their relationship imply for the classroom teacher? Remedial and Special Education, 18(1), 12–19.

Drymiotou, I., Constantinou, C. P., & Avraamidou, L. (2021) Enhancing students’ interest in science and understandings of STEM careers: the role of career-based scenarios. International Journal of Science Education, 43(5), 717-736.

Dutton, S. R. (2016). Change in perceived teacher self-efficacy of agricultural educators after a greenhouse management workshop. University of Kentucky. Theses and Dissertations-Community & Leadership Development.

Erickson, M. G., Erasmus, M. A., Karcher, D. M., Knobloch, N. A., & Karcher, E. L. (2019). Poultry in the classroom: effectiveness of an online poultry-science-based education program for high school STEM instruction. Poultry Science, 98(12), 6593-6601.

Estapa, A.T., & Tank, K.M. (2017). Supporting integrated STEM in the elementary classroom: a professional development approach centered on an engineering design challenge. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(6),

Fernandez, Goecker, Smith, Moran, & Wilson. (2020) Employment opportunities for college graduates in food, agriculture, renewable natural resources, and the environment. USDA.

Retrieved from

Ghaith, G. & Yaghi, H. (1997). Relationships among experience, teacher efficacy, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(4) 451-458.

Holstermann, N., Grube, D. & Bögeholz, S. (2010). Hands-on activities and their influence on students’ interest. Research in Science Education, 40, 743–757.

IBM SPSS. (2020). Statistics for Mac, Version 28.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.

Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(2).

Knobloch, N., Ball, A., & Allen, C. (2007). The benefits of teaching and learning about agriculture in elementary and junior high schools. Journal of Agricultural Education, 48(3), 25-36. https://doi:10.5032/jae.2007.03025

Kovar, K., & Ball, A. (2013). Two decades of agricultural literacy research: a synthesis of the literature. Journal of Agricultural Education, 54(1), 167-178. https://doi:10.5032/jae.2013.01167

Liao, Y. C., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., Zhu, M. (2021). How can we support online learning for elementary students? perceptions and experiences of award-winning K-6 teachers. TechTrends 65, 939–951.

Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Durik, A., Conley, A., Barron, K., Tauer, J., Karabenick, S., & Harackiewicz, J. (2010). Measuring situational interest in academic domains. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(4), 647-671.

Marks, D., LaRose, S., Brady, C., Erasmus, M., & Karcher, E. (2021). Integrated STEM and poultry science curriculum to increase agricultural literacy. Poultry Science, 100(10).

Mathis, C. (2020). Relax parents: teaching your kids from home offers opportunities. Southern Illinois University News. home.php

Membiela, P., Vidal, M., Fragueiro, S., Lorenzo, M., García-Rodeja, I., Aznar, V., Bugallo, A., & González, A. (2021). Motivation for science learning as an anecdote of emotions and engagement in preservice elementary teachers. Science Teacher Education, 106(1), 119- 141.

Menon, D., Sadler, T.D. (2018). Sources of science teaching self-efficacy for preservice elementary teachers in science content courses. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16, 835–855.

Mojavezi, A. & Tamiz, M. P. (2012). The impact of teacher self-efficacy on the students’ motivation and achievement. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(3), 483-491.

National Institute of Food and Agriculture. (2022). Agriculture in the classroom program. Retrieved from program#:~:text=NIFA's%20Agriculture%20in%20the%20Classroom,tours%2C%20and %20other%20educational%20activities.

Oje, O., Adesope, O., & Oje, V. A. (2021). Work in progress: the effects of hands-on learning on STEM students motivation and self-efficacy: a meta-analysis. American Society for Engineering Education.

Pense, S., Leising, J., Portillo, M., & Igo, C. (2005). Comparative assessment of student agriculture in the classroom programs. Journal of Agricultural Education, 46(3), 107- 118.

Pressley, T. (2021). Factors contributing to teacher burnout during COVID-19. Educational Researcher, 50(5), 325–327.

Qualtrics Inc. Provo, UT

Roberts, T. G., Harder, A., & Brashears, M. T. (2016). American association for agricultural education national research agenda: 2016-2020. Gainesville, FL: Department of Agricultural Education and Communication.

Rotgans, J. I., Schmidt, G. H. (2011). The role of teachers in facilitating situational interest in an active-learning classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 37-42,

Shahzad, K., & Naureen, S. (2017). Impact of teacher self-efficacy on secondary school students’ academic achievement. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 4(1), 48.

Skjott Linneberg, M. and Korsgaard, S. (2019). Coding qualitative data: a synthesis guiding the novice. Qualitative Research Journal, 19(3), 259-270. 2018-0012

Spielmaker, D. M., & Leising, J. G. (2013). National agricultural literacy outcomes. Logan, UT: Utah State University, School of Applied Sciences & Technology. Retrieved from

Sun, H., Chen, A., Ennis, C., Martin, R., & Shen, B. (2008). An Examination of the multidimensionality of situational interest in elementary school physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 79, 62-70.

Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55.

The Incredible Egg. (2021). Retrieved from schools/eggs-in-the-classroom/.

The POGIL Project. (2021).

United Nations. (2019). Growing at a slower pace, world population is expected to reach 9.7 billion in 2050 and could peak at nearly 11 billion around 2100. Retrieved from 2019.html

US Poultry and Egg Association. (2021). Retrieved from

van Tuijl, C., van der Molen, J. (2016). Study choice and career development in STEM fields: an overview and integration of the research. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 26, 159–183.

Yoon Yoon, S., Evans, M., & Strobel, J. (2014). Validation of the the teaching engineering self-efficacy scale for K-12 teachers: a structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(3), 463-485.




How to Cite

Simmermeyer, E. ., Fraley, G., LaRose, S. ., & Karcher, E. (2023). Impact of Teacher Self-Efficacy on Elementary STEM-Based Agricultural Curriculum. NACTA Journal, 67(1).