Student Optimal Experiences During an Undergraduate Nonprofit Organizational Management Course
Keywords:
EduFlow, optimal experience, flow theory, nonprofitAbstract
Utilizing a variety of instructional approaches in undergraduate education provides an opportunity to explore the complexity of student learning. The use of instructional approaches including traditional lectures, guest speakers as professional resources, experiential learning approaches requiring students to apply knowledge, and student-led learning experiences are all potential options for educators. Operationalizing optimal experience using the EduFlow model is one way to better analyze instructional approaches and learning where students: (1) have cognitive assimilation in the content being taught; (2) feel as though time is going quickly or being transformed during learning; (3) feel a loss of self-consciousness during the learning experience; and 4) perceive learning as an autotelic experience or the perception related to happiness in the excitement of the moment. The purpose of this research was to determine if there were differences between different instructional approaches and optimal experience constructs using the EduFlow model. Results indicate that leadership lectures, youth educational guest speakers, experiential learning lessons, and student-led experiences were likely to be associated with optimal experiences by learners. The authors recommend further research associated with specific types of nonprofit lectures, guest speaker traits, experiential learning frameworks, and student-led experience.
Downloads
References
Ahmed, S. (2013). Effective nonprofit management: Context, concepts and competencies. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor and Francis Group.
Asakawa, K. (2010). Flow experience, culture, and well-being: How do autotelic Japanese college students feel, behave, and think in their daily lives? Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 205-223.
Bell, R., & Bell, H. (2020). Applying educational theory to develop a framework to support the delivery of experiential entrepreneurship education. Journal of Small Business Development, 27(6), 987-1004. http://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-01-2020-0012
Burns, C., & Chopra, S. (2017). A meta-analysis of the effect of industry engagement on student learning in undergraduate programs. Journal of Technology, Management, and Applied Engineering, 33(1), 1-20.
Bylieva, D., Bekirogullari, Z., Kuznetsov, D., Almazova, N., Lobatyuk, V., & Rubtsova, A.
(2020). Online group student-peer-communication as an element of open education. Future internet, 12, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi12090143
Casper, A. M. A., & Balgopal, M. M. (2020). How guest experts tell stories about environmental socio-scientific issues in an undergraduate class. International Journal of Science Education, 42(9), 1568-1584. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1772519
Craig, C. M., Bergstrom, A. M., & Buschhorn, J. (2020). All guest speakers are not created equal: Diverse students require diverse speakers. Journal of Advertising Education, 24(2), 150-167. http://doi.org/10.1177/1098048220956939
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life.
New York, NY: Basic Books.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (2014). Validity and reliability of the experience sampling
method. In Csikszentmihalyi, M. (Ed.), Flow and the foundations of positive psychology (pp. 33-52). New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.
El Mawas, N., & Heutte, J. (2019). A Flow Measurement Instrument to Test the Students’
Motivation in a Computer Science Course. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU 2019), 495-505. http://doi.org/10.5220/0007771504950505
Everett, M. W., Eustice, C. L., & Raven, M. R. (2021). Optimal Experiences and
narrative transportation in an environmental and sustainability film course during the initial Covid-19 outbreak: Comparisons between in-person and online. Journal of the North American Colleges & Teachers of Agriculture, COVID Special Issue, 65, 132-141.
Everett, M. W., Gretter, S., Stewart, P., & Raven, M. R. (2020). Relationships between optimal
experiences, narrative transport and mental models of undergraduate students in an environmental and sustainability film course. Journal of the North American Colleges & Teachers of Agriculture, 64, 152-160.
Everett, M. W., & Raven, M. R. (2018). Measuring optimal experiences of CANR
undergraduates in a leadership course. Journal of Agricultural Education, 59(1), 35-50. http://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2018.01035
Fitch, J. G. (1880). Lectures on teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Frisch, E. M., Bhatter, P., Grimaud, L. W., Tiourin, E., Youm, J. H., & Greenberg, M. L. (2020).
A preference for peers over faculty: Implementation and evaluation of medical student-led physiology exam review tutorials. Advanced Physiology Education, 44, 520-524. http://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00084.2020
Hashmi, S. S., Saad, A., Leps, C., Gillies-Podgorecki, J., Feeney, B., Hardy, C., Falzone, N., Archibald, D., Hoang, T., Bond, A., Wang, J., Alkhateeb, Q., Penney, D., DiFalco, A., & Pottie, K. (2020). A student-led curriculum framework for homeless and vulnerably housed populations. BMC Medical Education, 20(232), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02143-z
Hektner, J. M., Schmidt, J. A., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2007). Experience sampling method:
Measuring the quality of everyday life. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Hochberg, Y. (1974). Some generalizations of the T-method in simultaneous inference. Journal
of Multivariate Analysis, 4, 224-234.
Hoefer, R., & Watson, L. D. (2021). Essentials of Nonprofit Management Leadership: A Skill-
Based Approach. San Diego, CA: Cognella, Inc.
Huette, J., Fenouillet, F., Kaplan, J., Martin-Krumm, C., & Bachelet, R. (2016). The EduFlow
Model: A Contribution Toward the Study of Optimal Learning Environment. In Harmat, L., Andersen, F.O., Ullen, F. and Wright, J. (Eds.), Flow Experience: Empirical Research and Applications (pp. 127-143). Basel, AG: Springer International Publishing.
Knight, J. K., & Wood, W. B. (2005). Teaching more by lecturing less. Cell Biology Education,
, 298-310.
Kolb, D. 1984. Experiential Learning, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Marin, L. (2020). University lecturing as a technique of collective imagination: On seeing things
as if they had taken a bodily form. In Hodgson, N., Vlieghe, J., & Zamojski, P. (Eds.), Debating higher education: Philosophical perspective, vol 3 (pp. 73-82). Cham, AG: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45019-9_6
Merle, P. F., & Craig, C. (2017). Be my guest: A survey of mass communication students’
perception of guest speakers. College Teaching, 65(2), 41-49. http://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2016.1232691
Nasmith, L., & Steinert, Y. (2001). The evaluation of a workshop to promote interactive
Lecturing. Teaching and Learning in Medicine. 13(1), 43-48. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328015TLM1301_8
National Center for Charitable Statistics Team (NCCS). (2020). The nonprofit sector in brief.
Accessed February 7, 2021. https://nccs.urban.org/project/nonprofit-sector-brief.
Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2009). Flow theory and research. In Snyder, C. R., &
Lopez, S. J. (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 195-206). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
National Research Council. (2009). Transforming agricultural education for a changing world.
Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Rosenshine, B., & Furst, K. (1973). The use of direct observation to study teaching. In Travers,
R. M. W. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on teaching. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
Rogatko, T. P. (2009). The influence of flow on positive affect in college students. Journal
of Happiness Studies, 10, 133-148.
Sulkowski, A. J., Kowalczyk, W., Ahrendsen, B. L., Kowalski, R., & Majewski, E. (2020).
Enhancing sustainability education through experiential learning of sustainability reporting. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 21(6), 1233-1247. http://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-06-2019-0185
Tavanti, M., & Wilp, E. A. (2018). Experiential by design: Integrating experiential learning
strategies into nonprofit management education. Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership, 8(4), 375-402. https://doi.org/10.18666/JNEL-2018-V8-I4-9234
Trinh, M. P., van Esch, C., Martinez, H. A., & Messer, T. (2021). Appreciating large classes:
Using appreciative inquiry to foster a hospitable learning space for experiential learning. Journal of Management Education, 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562920980125
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wurdinger, S., & Carlson, J. (2010). Teaching for experiential learning: Five approaches that
work. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Education.
Zheng, S. L., Chen, Y. S., Wang, X., Hoffmann, C., & Volkov, A. (2018). From the source:
Student-centred guest lecturing in a chemical crystallography class. Journal of Applied Crystallography, 51, 909-914. https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600576718004120
