Course Development to Address Gaps in Horticulture Content Standards for Students in an Agricultural Education Undergraduate Degree Program
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56103/nactaj.v66i1.49Keywords:
Agricultural Education, course development, horticulture education, pre-service teacher development, undergraduate educationAbstract
Agricultural Education teacher licensure programs face a growing list of coursework needed to meet requirements with a shrinking number of credit hours available. A new course – ‘Greenhouse and Landscape Fundamentals for Educators’ was developed at Purdue University with an Agricultural Education Teacher Licensure B.S. degree program. Data utilized in creating the course included: 1) an evaluation of current Agricultural Education coursework; 2) a review of state and national Agricultural Education content and academic standards; and 3) a survey of current Indiana Agriculture teachers. Responses from the survey (n=72) of high school teachers of horticulture and/or landscape management show 61% of respondents had teaching greenhouses at their schools, and 62% reporting they were not confident with operating and maintaining a greenhouse based on bachelor level coursework they took. Respondents indicate needing more coursework in several topics: greenhouse management landscape design, landscape installation and maintenance, and plant identification. Results pointed to gaps in existing required coursework. The new course was specifically tailored to meet the needs of the Agricultural Education undergraduate students, and equip them with information and resources to call upon when they begin their teaching careers.
Downloads
References
Literature Cited
AASCU. (2016). AASCU Teacher Preparation Report. https://www.aascu.org/AcademicAffairs/TeacherEdReport.pdf. American Association of State Colleges and Universities. Oct. 15, 2018.
Albritton, M. C., & Roberts, T. G. (2020). Agricultural Technical Skills Needed by Entry Level Agriculture Teachers: A Modified Delphi Study. Journal of Agricultural Education, 61(2).
Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., and Norman, M. K. (2010). How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley and Sons.
Assor A., and Kaplan H. (2001). Mapping the Domain of Autonomy Support. In: Efklides A., Kuhl J., Sorrentino R.M. (eds.) Trends and Prospects in Motivation Research. Dordrecht: Springer.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 52:1–26.
BLS. (2018). Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment Statistics. https://www.bls.gov/oes/2018/may/oes452092.htm#nat. May 15, 2020.
Kaplan, H., and Madjar, N. (2017). The Motivational Outcomes of Psychological Need Support among Pre-Service Teachers: Multicultural and Self-determination Theory Perspectives. Front. Educ. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2017.00042
Lovett, M.C. (2001). A collaborative convergence on studying reasoning processes: A case study in statistics. In S. Carver and D. Klahr (eds.). Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (pp. 347-384). Mahwah, NJ: Earlbaum.
NCTQ, (2013). Teacher Prep Review. National Council of Teacher Quality.
https://www.nctq.org/dmsView/Teacher_Prep_Review_2013_Report. Oct. 15, 2018.
Schunk, D. H., and Usher, E. L. (2019). Social cognitive theory and motivation. The Oxford handbook of human motivation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Seifert, T. (2004). Understanding student motivation. Educational Research. 46(2): 137-149.
Weldon, T. (2013). Reducing Time to Degree by Cutting Credit Creep. Council of State Governments.
http://knowledgecenter.csg.org/kc/content/reducing-time-degree-cutting-credit-creep. Oct. 15, 2018.
