Online versus In-Person Instruction in a Laboratory-Based Animal and Veterinary Science Course
Online versus In-Person Animal Science
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56103/nactaj.v66i1.41Keywords:
animal and veterinary science, education, hybrid instruction, online instruction, online laboratoryAbstract
Online educational modalities are used extensively in courses that do not require hands-on laboratory experiences. However, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a need for transition from in-person to online laboratory-based courses, especially in animal and veterinary science courses. This study evaluated 163 undergraduate students enrolled in an introductory animal and veterinary science laboratory in the fall 2020 semester. Using surveys throughout the semester, student responses were collected and evaluated. Results indicated student performance on quizzes and exams were better during online instruction compared with in-person instruction, which contradicted previous studies reported in the literature. As a majority of these students were first-year, first-semester students, their metacognitive abilities were likely not fully developed. This laboratory course was taught initially online for the first half of the semester and then transitioned to in-person instruction as the university public health regulations allowed. Socially shared metacognitive regulation was only exercised during the in-person portion of the class. Results indicate an animal and veterinary science laboratory can successfully be taught online.
Downloads
References
Ackerman, R., & M. Goldsmith. [2011]. Metacognitive regulation of text learning: On screen versus on paper. J. Exper. Psychol. Appl. 17[1]: 18-32.
Avargil, S., R. Lavi, & Y. J. Dori. [2018]. Student’s metacognition and metacognitive strategies in science education. In: Y. J. Dori et al., (eds.). Cognition, metacognition, and culture in STEM education. Innovation in Science and Technology 24:33-64.
Baleni, Z. G. [2015]. Online formative assessment in higher education: Its pros and cons. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning 13[4]: 228-236.
Brown, A. L. [1978]. Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. Advances in Instructional Psychology 1:77-165.
Carr, M. [2010]. The importance of metacognition for conceptual change and strategy use in mathematics. H. S. Waters and W. Schneider (Eds.), Metacognition, Strategy Use & Instruction. London: The Guilford Press. 176-197.
Gallagher, S. [2019]. Online education in 2019: A synthesis of the data. (https://cps.northeastern.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Online_Ed_in_2019.pdf). Center for the Future of Higher Education and Talent Strategy. 9 November 2021.
Gallagher, S., & Palmer, J. [2020]. The pandemic pushed universities online. The change was long overdue. (https://hbr.org/2020/09/the-pandemic-pushed-universities-online-the- change-was-long-overdue). Harvard Business Review. 9 November 2021.
Iiskala, T., S. Volet, E. Lehtinen, & M. Vauras. [2015]. Socially shared metacognitive regulation in asynchronous CSCL in science: Functions, evolution, and participation. Frontline Learning Research 3[1]: 78-111.
Jacobs, J. E., & S. G. Paris. [1987]. Children’s metacognition about reading: Issues in definition, measurement, and instruction. Educational Psychologist 22[3]: 255-278.
McGraw, N. [2020]. The state of online education in 2020. (https://www.onlineschoolsreport.com/the-state-of-online-education/). Online Schools Report. 9 November 2021.
Meyers, S. A. [2008]. Using transformative pedagogy when teaching online. College Teaching 56[4]: 219-224. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.56.4.219-224
National Student Clearinghouse Research Center. [2021]. COVID-19: Stay informed with the latest enrollment information. (https://nscresearchcenter.org/stay-informed/). National Student Clearinghouse. 9 November 2021.
Oliver, R. [1999]. Exploring strategies for online teaching and learning. Distance Education 20[2]: 240-254. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791990200205
Pellas, N., & I. Kazanidis. [2015]. On the value of Second Life for student’s engagement in blended and online courses: A comparative study from the higher education in Greece. Educ. Inf. Technol. 20:445-466.
Stanton, J. D., X. N. Neider, I. J. Gallegos, & N. C. Clark. [2015]. Differences in metacognitive regulation in introductory biology students: When prompts are not enough. CBE – Life Science Education 14: 1-12.
Stephanou, G., & Mpiontini, M. H. [2017]. Metacognitive knowledge and metacognitive regulation in self-regulatory learning style, and in its effects on performance expectation and subsequent performance across diverse school subjects. Psychology 8[12]: 1941- 1975.
Wallis, L. [2020]) Growth in distance learning outpaces total enrollment growth. (https://www.qualityinfo.org/-/growth-in-distance-learning-outpaces-total-enrollment- growth). State of Oregon Employment Department. 9 November 2021.
Wang, J., & Y. Wang. [2021]. Compare synchronous and asynchronous online instruction for science teacher preparation. Journal of Science Teacher Education 32[3]: 265-285.
Wingo, N. P., Ivankova, N. V., & Moss, J. A. [2017]. Faculty perceptions about teaching online: Exploring the literature using the technology acceptance model as an organizing framework. Online Learning 21[1]: 1-21.
