Social Annotation in Agriculture Classrooms: Using Hypothesis to Promote Student Engagement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56103/nactaj.v69iTT.318Keywords:
Social Annotation, Agricultural Education, Classroom Teaching ToolsDownloads
References
Brown, M., & Croft, B. (2020). Social annotation and an inclusive praxis for open pedagogy in the college classroom. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2020(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.561
Ebner, H., Manouselis, N., Palmer, M., Enoksson, F., Palavitsinis, N., Kastrantas, K., & Naeve,
A. (2009). Learning object annotation for agricultural learning repositories. 2009 Ninth
IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 438–442.
https://doi.org/10.1109/icalt.2009.34
Gao, F. (2013). A case study of using a social annotation tool to support collaboratively learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 17, 76–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.11.002
Kalir, J. (2022). The value of social annotation for teaching and learning: Promoting comprehension, collaboration and critical thinking with Hypothesis. Hypothesis. https://web.hypothes.is/research-white-paper/
Novak, E., Razzouk, R., & Johnson, T. E. (2012). The educational use of social annotation tools
in higher education: A literature review. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1),