Instructor Perceptions of Teaching in Undergraduate Equine Programs During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Authors

  • Rebecca K. Splan Department of Equine Science and Management, Delaware Valley University, Doylestown, PA
  • C. A. "Shea" Porr Department of Animal and Equine Science, Murray State University, Murray, KY
  • Amy S. Biddle Department of Animal and Food Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE
  • Lena Luck Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE
  • Kim Cole Department of Animal Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
  • C. Jill Stowe Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56103/nactaj.v66i1.31

Keywords:

Equine Education, Remote Learning, COVID-19

Abstract

In March, 2020, campus restrictions associated with COVID-19 necessitated significant changes to undergraduate instruction at institutions of higher education. Rapid, unplanned transitions to remote learning caused disruptions for all educators, especially those who traditionally facilitate student learning via wet labs or live animal interactions, as is common within equine science and management courses. This study sought to identify teaching challenges and strategies associated with pandemic-era instruction among educators in equine science and management. Instructors who taught undergraduate equine science or management courses in the United States before and after the spring of 2020 (n=43 respondents) completed an online survey distributed during Spring 2021. Approximately two-thirds of educators of lecture-based courses, and approximately 40% of educators of laboratory-based courses incorporated an online element into their teaching as a result of COVID-19. Content delivery and assessments were altered to accommodate remote learning, although participants noted lower student engagement and participation. Respondents were generally satisfied with their institutions’ ability to provide resources to meet the challenges of teaching during COVID-19 but indicated challenges related to work-life balance and working from home. Results from this study can be used to develop resources to improve instruction during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aburumman, M. F. (2021). E-Assessment of Students’ Activities During Covid-19 Pandemic: Challenges, Advantages, and Disadvantages. International Journal of Contemporary Management and Information Technology, 2(1), 1-7.

Adedoyin, O. B., & Soykan, E. (2020). Covid-19 pandemic and online learning: the challenges and opportunities. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-13.

Aubry, L. M., Laverty, T. M., & Ma, Z. (2021). Impacts of COVID‐19 on ecology and evolutionary biology faculty in the United States. Ecological Applications, 31(2), e2265.

Bilen, E., & Matros, A. (2021). Online cheating amid COVID-19. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 182, 196-211.

Boland, K. (2017). An analysis of distance education adoption barriers within colleges and programs of agriculture. [Doctoral dissertation, Auburn University].

Catalan, E., Drewery, M. L., Anderson, R. G., & Sudhakaran, P. O. (2021). Learning management software (LMS) for teaching agricultural sciences: The role of age in faculty's adoption before and during COVID-19. North American Colleges and Teachers of Agriculture (NACTA) Journal, 65, 442-454.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021). Considerations for institutions of higher education.

Colclasure, B. C., Marlier, A., Durham, M. F., Brooks, T. D., & Kerr, M. (2021). Identified Challenges from Faculty Teaching at Predominantly Undergraduate Institutions after Abrupt Transition to Emergency Remote Teaching during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Education Sciences, 11(9), 556.

Cuseo, J. (2018). Student–faculty engagement. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2018(154), 87-97.

Davis, K. (2020). Agricultural education and extension in a time of COVID. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 26(3), 237-238.

Easterly III, R. T., Humphrey, K., & Roberts, T. G. (2021). The Impacts of COVID-19 on school-based agricultural education teachers in the US. Advancements in Agricultural Development, 2(1), 1-13.

Eaton, S. E., & Turner, K. L. (2020). Exploring academic integrity and mental health during COVID-19: Rapid review. Journal of Contemporary Education Theory & Research (JCETR), 4(2), 35-41.

Erickson, M., & Wattiaux, M. A. (2021). Practices and perceptions at the COVID‐19 transition in undergraduate animal science courses. Natural Sciences Education, 50(1).

Grice, A. L. (2018). 2017 American Horse Council economic impact study. In Proceedings of the 64th Annual Convention of the American Association of Equine Practitioners, San Francisco, California, USA, 1-5 December 2018 (pp. 502-504). American Association of Equine Practitioners (AAEP).

Johnson, N., Veletsianos, G., & Seaman, J. (2020). US Faculty and Administrators' Experiences and Approaches in the Early Weeks of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Online Learning, 24(2), 6-21.

Joia, L. A., & Lorenzo, M. (2021). Zoom in, zoom out: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in the classroom. Sustainability, 13(5), 2531.

Khairil, L. F., & Mokshein, S. E. (2018). 21st century assessment: online assessment. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(1), 659-672.

Lancaster, T., & Cotarlan, C. (2021). Contract cheating by STEM students through a file sharing website: a Covid-19 pandemic perspective. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 17(1), 1-16.

Lee, J., & Jung, I. (2021). Instructional changes instigated by university faculty during the COVID-19 pandemic: the effect of individual, course and institutional factors. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1-19.

Matters, M. E., Brightman, A. O., Buzzanell, P. M., & Zoltowski, C. B. (2021). Inclusive teaching in isolating situations: Impact of COVID-19 on efforts toward increasing diversity in BME. Biomedical Engineering Education, 1(1), 73-77.

National Association of Equine Affiliated Academics (NAEAA). (2021). Resources. National Association of Equine Affiliated Academics (NAEAA). https://www.naeaa.com/resources.

Pedro, N. S., & Kumar, S. (2020). Institutional Support for Online Teaching in Quality Assurance Frameworks. Online Learning, 24(3), 50-66.

Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guàrdia, L., & Koole, M. (2020). Online university teaching during and after the Covid-19 crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 923-945.

Roberts, T. G., Moore, L. L., & Dyer, J. E. (2005). Distance education: A synthesis of research from agricultural and extension education. North American Colleges and Teachers of Agriculture (NACTA) Journal, 49(1), 44-51.

Rupnow, R. L., LaDue, N. D., James, N. M., & Bergan-Roller, H. E. (2020). A perturbed system: how tenured faculty responded to the COVID-19 shift to remote instruction. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 2397-2407.

Splan, R. K., & Porr, C. A. (2011). Teaching load among faculty and full-time instructors of equine science at land-grant universities. North American Colleges and Teachers of Agriculture (NACTA) Journal, 55(3), 14-18.

Sunasee, R. (2020). Challenges of teaching organic chemistry during Covid-19 pandemic at a primarily undergraduate institution. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 3176–3181. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00542

Supriya, K., Mead, C., Anbar, A. D., Caulkins, J. L., Collins, J. P., Cooper, K. M., ... & Brownell, S. E. (2021). Undergraduate Biology Students Received Higher Grades During COVID-19 but Perceived Negative Effects on Learning. In Frontiers in Education (p. 428). Frontiers.

Tasci, K., Drewery, M., Anderson, R., & Swafford, M. (2021). Adoption of Software in the Post-Secondary Agricultural Classroom as a Result of the COVID-19 Pandemic. North American Colleges and Teachers of Agriculture (NACTA) Journal, COVID-19 Special Issue, 44-54.

Villanueva, O., Behmke, D. A., Morris, J. D., Simmons, R., Anfuso, C., Woodbridge, C. M., & Guo, Y. (2020). Adapting to the COVID-19 Online Transition: Reflections in a General Chemistry Sequence Taught by Multiple Instructors with Diverse Pedagogies. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 2458-2465. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00752

Walker, D. S., Lindner, J. R., Murphrey, T. P., & Dooley, K. (2016). Learning management system usage. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 17(2), 41-50.

Walsh, L. L., Lichti, D. A., Zambrano-Varghese, C. M., Borgaonkar, A. D., Sodhi, J. S., Moon, S., Webster, E. R., & Callis-Duehl, K. L. (2021). Why and how science students in the United States think their peers cheat more frequently online: perspectives during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 17(1), 1-18.

Wiederhold, B. K. (2020). Connecting through technology during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: Avoiding “Zoom Fatigue”. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 23(7), 437-438.

Downloads

Published

07/28/2023

How to Cite

Splan, R. K., Porr, C. A. "Shea", Biddle, A. S., Luck, L., Cole, K., & Stowe, C. J. (2023). Instructor Perceptions of Teaching in Undergraduate Equine Programs During the COVID-19 Pandemic. NACTA Journal, 66(1). https://doi.org/10.56103/nactaj.v66i1.31

Issue

Section

Manuscripts