Analysis of Competency Assessments Used in an Upper-Level Soil Fertility Course
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56103/nactaj.v68i1.187Keywords:
Assessment, Competency, MasteryAbstract
Competency-based assessments are a common tool used to increase retention and understanding for students in university courses. This analysis of competency assessments in an upper-level soil science course focuses on both the measurable, quantitative impact of the use of competency assessments on student learning as well as the qualitative student perceptions of their use when a compulsory mastery of the assessment was required. This study utilizes data from two years of the course over which the competency assessments and mastery of the content on the assessment to a required 100% was introduced to examine the impact on student learning. Quantitatively, the results of the study are mixed as a result of the compulsory mastery of the content. However, through focus groups, students expressed value and an appreciation of the competency assessments in learning and retaining course material. This analysis expresses the importance of not only the measurable impact of teaching practices, but also the perception of those practices by students.
Downloads
References
Bacon, R. K., & Beyrouty, C. A. (1988). Test retakes by groups of students as a technique to enhance learning. Journal of Agronomic Education, 17(2), 99-101.
Baral, K., Offutt, J., Ammann, P., & Mohod, R. (2021). Practice makes better: quiz retake software to increase student learning. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Education through Advanced Software Engineering and Artificial Intelligence (pp. 47-53).
Bradley, E. J., Board, L., Archer, D., & Morgans, M. (2022). Evaluation of entrustable professional activities and competency assessment in sport and exercise sciences in higher education: Student perceptions of the impact on learning. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 31, 100402.
Brandi, K., Rabadia, S. V., Chang, A., & Mandel, J. (2018). Benefits of focus group discussions beyond online surveys in course evaluations by medical students in the United States: a qualitative study. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 15.
Combéfis, S., & Van den Schrieck, V. (2022). Continuous competency-based assessment: Impact of regular student involvement on their performances and success. Higher Education, 4, 7.
Emeka, C., Bretl, T., Herman, G., West, M., & Zilles, C. (2021). Students' perceptions and behavior related to second-chance testing. In 2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1-8). IEEE.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
Juhler, S. M., Rech, J. F., From, S. G., & Brogan, M. M. (1998). The effect of optional retesting on college students' achievement in an individualized algebra course. The Journal of Experimental Education, 66(2), 125-137.
Nordstokke, D. W., Zumbo, B. D., Cairns, S. L., & Saklofske, D. H. (2011). The operating characteristics of the nonparametric Levene test for equal variances with assessment and evaluation data. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 16(1), 5.
Park, C. (2003). Engaging students in the learning process: The learning journal. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 27(2), 183-199.
Rosales, E., Chavarga, A., Grandoit, E., Mayer, S., Hackman, N., Elbulok-Charcape, M., ... & Horowitz, G. (2019). An exam wrapper intervention in Organic Chemistry I. Journal of College Science Teaching, 49(2), 53-61.
Rozell, T. G., Johnson, J., Sexten, A., & Rhodes, A. E. (2017). Correcting missed exam questions as a learning tool in a physiology course. Journal of College Science Teaching, 46(5).
Schroeter, C., Green, V. S., & Bess, E. (2010). Second time is a charm: The impact of correcting missed exam questions on student learning. NACTA Journal, 54(2), 21-29.
Seemiller, C., Grace, M., Dal Bo Campagnolo, P., Mara Da Rosa Alves, I., & Severo De Borba, G. (2021). What makes learning enjoyable? Perspectives of today’s college students in the U.S. and Brazil. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 5(1), 1-17.
