Does Autonomy Improve Satisfaction and Performance? A Case on Learner Choice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56103/nactaj.v68i1.178Keywords:
agricultural leadership, film, learner-centered teaching, teamwork, group developmentAbstract
Autonomy has been identified as an essential attribute of learner-centered teaching. Allowing learners some choice regarding their learning can positively impact motivation and performance. Some concepts can be illustrated more clearly through film, including agricultural leadership concepts such as the stages of small group development. In this study, we examined differences between learners given autonomy to choose a film for an analysis essay assignment and learners not given a choice. Learners in two sections of an agricultural leadership course focusing on teams and group development were taught the stages of group development. Learners analyzed the development of a team in film. Additionally, learners responded to questions regarding their satisfaction with and perceptions of the assignment. Findings revealed that learners in both sections perceived the assignment as enjoyable. Learners in both groups indicated a preference for their respective treatment in future similar assignments. Both groups performed well on the assignment. Recommendations include replicating this study with an additional measure of motivation, a standardized measure for student satisfaction with learning, and a larger sample size. Given that both groups of learners indicated satisfaction with learning, we recommend instructors consider incorporating films or other media when possible and appropriate.
Downloads
References
Arendt, A., Trego, A., & Allred, J. (2016). Students reach beyond expectations with cafeteria style grading. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 8(1), 2-17. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-03-2014-0048
Aspinwall, L. E. (1937). Study of the possibilities of the use of film strips and motion pictures as an integral part of the teaching of vocational agriculture in Colorado high schools [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Colorado State College. https://api.mountainscholar.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/bca46d41-bc34-4428-a5a7-01863c7247ec/content
Baldwin, T. T., Magjuka, R. J., & Loher, B. T. (1991). The perils of participation: Effects of choice of training on trainee motivation and learning. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 51- 65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00690.x
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern‐based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21(1), 37-47. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360
Brooks, C. F., & Young, S. L. (2011). Are choice-making opportunities needed in the classroom? Using Self-Determination Theory to consider student motivation and learner empowerment. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23(1), 48-59.
Callahan, J. L., & Rosser, M. H. (2007). Pop goes the program: Using popular culture artifacts to educational leaders. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 9(2), 269-287. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422306298902
Comer, D. R. (2001). Not just a Mickey mouse exercise: using Disney’s The Lion King to teach leadership. Journal of Management Education, 25(4), 430-436. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562901025004
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press.
Deci, E., Vallerand, R., Pelletier, L., & Ryan, R. (1991). Motivation and education: The Self- Determination Perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3), 325-346. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_6
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Di Domenico, S. I., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). The emerging neuroscience of Intrinsic Motivation: A new frontier in self-determination research. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00145
Edwards, G., Schedlitzki, D., Ward, J., & Wood, M. (2015). Exploring critical perspectives of toxic and bad leadership through film. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 17(3), 363-375. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422315587903
English, F. W., & Steffy, B. E. (1997). Using film to teach leadership in educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 33(1), 107-115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X970330010
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Aldine.
Graham, T. S., Ackermann, J. C., & Maxwell, K. K. (2004). Reel leadership II: Getting emotional at the movies. Journal of Leadership Education, 3(3), 44-57.
Hanewicz, C., Platt, A., & Arendt, A. (2017). Creating a learner-centered teaching environment using student choice in assignments. Distance Education, 38(3), 273-287. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1369349
Hannay, M., & Venne, R. (2012). It's showtime: Using movies to teach leadership in online courses. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 8(3), 238-247.
Hinck, S. S., et al. (1995, November 19). Integrating media into the communication classroom as an experiential learning tool: A guide to processing and debriefing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, San Antonio, TX.
Klit, J. A. (1969). Experimental evaluation of single-concept films as instructional aids in teaching vocational agriculture [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Iowa State University. https://login.lp.hscl.ufl.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/experimental-evaluation-single-concept-films-as/docview/287927106/se-2
Lee, V., & Lo, A. (2014). From theory to practice: Teaching management using films through deductive and inductive processes. The International Journal of Management Education, 12(2014), 44-54.
Lewis, L. K., & Hayward, P. A. (2003). Choice-based learning: Student reactions in an undergraduate organizational communication course. Communication Education, 52(2), 148-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520302467
MacNaul, H., Garcia, R., Cividini-Motta, C., & Thacker, I. (2021). Effect of assignment choice on student academic performance in an online class. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 14(4), 1074-1078. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-021-00566-8
McNeal, K. S., Spry, J. M., Mitra, R., & Tipton, J. L. (2014). Measuring student engagement, knowledge, and perceptions of climate change in an introductory environmental geology course. Journal of Geoscience Education, 62(4), 655-667. https://doi.org/10.5408/13-111.1
Oyelana, O. O., Olson, J., & Caine, V. (2022). An evolutionary concept analysis of learner-centered teaching. Nurse Education Today, 108, Article 105187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105187
Ogston-Tuck, S., Baume, K., Clarke, C., & Heng, S. (2016). Understanding the patient experience through the power of film: A mixed method qualitative research study. Nurse Education Today, 46 (2016), 69-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.08.025
Rosser, M. H. (2007). The magic of leadership: An exploration of Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 9(2), 236-250. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422306298869
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and Future Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). Sage Publishing.
Saldaña, J., & Omasta, M. (2022). Qualitative research: Analyzing life (2nd ed.). Sage Publishing.
Schneider, S., Nebel, S., Beege, M., & Rey, G. D. (2018). The autonomy-enhancing effects of choice on cognitive load, motivation and learning with digital media. Learning and Instruction, 58, 161-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.06.006
Sheldon, K. M., & Prentice, M. (2019). Self-determination theory as a foundation for personality researchers. Journal of Personality, 87(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12360
Sprinkle, T. A., & Urick, M. J. (2016). Alternatives to the movie sandwich habit: Practical approaches to using movies to teach leadership and power. Management Teaching Review, 1(2), 105-119. https://doi.org/10.1177/2379298115624944
Tuckman, B. W., & Jensen, M. A. C. (1977). Stages of small-group development revisited. Group & Organization Studies, 2(4), 419-427. https://doi.org/10.1177/105960117700200404
von Mizener, B. H., & Williams, R. L. (2009). The effects of student choices on academic performance. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 11(2), 110-128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300708323372
Waller, M. J., Sohrab, G., & Ma, B. W. (2013). Beyond 12 Angry Men: Thin-slicing film to illustrate group dynamics. Small Group Research, 44(4), 446-465. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496413487409
Weeks, W. G., & Weeks, P. P. (2020). Agricultural sciences and natural resources: Developing future agricultural leaders. New Directions for Student Leadership, 2020(165), 37-48. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.20367
Wimmer, G., Meyers, C., Porter, H., & Shaw, M. (2012). Learning vicariously: Students' reflections of the leadership lessons portrayed in The Office. Journal of Leadership Education, 11(2), 52-70.
Williams, J. R. (2006). Pirates and power: What Captain Jack Sparrow, his friends, and his foes can teach us about power bases. Journal of Leadership Education, 5(2), 60-68.
