Gendered Differences in Acknowledgements for Doctoral Advisors at a Land-Grant University
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56103/nactaj.v68i1.177Keywords:
Gendered language, graduate advising, advisor roles, acknowledgementsAbstract
The acknowledgements section of a doctoral dissertation provides a rare view into the student-advisor relationship. The gendered differences for how doctoral students acknowledge male and female advisors was examined in 208 dissertations from a U.S. land-grant university. Doctoral students used a greater number and diversity of words when acknowledging female advisors. Nine hierarchical thematic roles and obligations of advisors were identified and were equally represented in acknowledging male and female advisors. Doctoral students described the roles and obligations of their doctoral advisor independently of gender; however, they used gendered language, which highlights the persistence of gendered norms within academic culture.
Downloads
References
Anderson, E. W., Vanner, C., Wotipka, C. M., & Kelly, K. (2021). "Participation does not equal voice'': Gendered experiences in an academic and professional society. Comparative Education Review, 65(3), 534–554.
Barnes, B. J., & Austin, A. E. (2009). The role of doctoral advisors: A look at advising from the advisor’s perspective. Innovative Higher Education, 33(5), 297-315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-008-9084-x
Belcher, D. (1994). The apprenticeship approach to advanced academic literacy: Graduate students and their mentors. English for Specific Purposes, 13(1), 23-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90022-1
Beres, J. L., & Dixon, J. C. (2016). Examining the role of friendship in mentoring relationships between graduate students and faculty advisors. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, 9, 111-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/1361126042000183066
Borrego, A., Barrios, M., Villarroya, A., & Ollé, C. (2010). Scientific output and impact of postdoctoral scientists: A gender perspective. Scientometrics, 83(1), 93-101.
Copenheaver, C. A., Nelson, K. L., & Goldbeck, K. (2009). The academic roots of forestry programs: A case study from Virginia Tech. Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education, 38, 99-105.
Craft, C. M., Augustine-Shaw, D., Fairbanks, A., & Adams-Wright, G. (2016). Advising doctoral students in education programs. NACADA Journal, 36(1), 54-65.
Gearity, B. T., & Mertz, N. (2012). From "Bitch" to "Mentor": A doctoral student's story of self-change and mentoring. Qualitative Report, 17, 1-27.
Hollingsworth, M. A., & Fassinger, R. E. (2002). The role of faculty mentors in the research training of counseling psychology doctoral students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49(3), 324-330.
Judson, E., Ross, L., & Glassmeyer, K. (2019). How research, teaching, and leadership roles are recommended to male and female engineering faculty differently. Research in Higher Education, 60(7), 1025-1047.
Koslov, L. (2019). Avoiding climate change: "Agnostic adaptation" and the politics of public silence. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 109(2), 568-580. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2018.1549472
Mansson, D. H., & Myers, S. A. (2012). Using mentoring enactment theory to explore the doctoral student-advisor mentoring relationship. Communication Education, 61(4), 309-334.
Marcus, A. I. (2015). Introduction. In A. I. Marcus (Ed.), Science as Service: Establishing and Reformulating American Land Grant Universities, 1865 - 1930 (pp. 1-8). University of Alabama Press.
Marsh, E. J. (2017). Family matters: Measuring impact through one's academic descendants. Perspectives on Psycological Science, 12(6), 1130-1132. https://doi.org/10.117/1745691617719759
Morison, T., & Macleod, C. (2013). A performative-performance analytical approach: Infusing Butlerian Theory into the Narrative-Discursive Method. Qualitative Inquiry, 19(8), 566-577. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800413494344
Nadler, M. K., & Nadler, L. B. (2001). The roles of sex, empathy, and credibility in out-of-class communication between faculty and students. Women's Studies in Communication, 24(2), 241-261. https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2001.10162436
R Core Team. (2021). R: A language environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.
Saldaña, J. (2013). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Sage.
Schrivener, L. (2009). An exploratory analysis of history students' dissertation acknowledgements. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 35(3), 241-251.
Settles, I. H., & O’Connor, R. C. (2014). Incivility at academic conferences: Gender differences and the mediating role of climate. Sex Roles, 71(1-2), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-014-0355-y
Simon, E. (2017). Scholars in the humanities and the sciences should value one another. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2017/01/06/scholars-humanities-and-sciences-should-value-one-another-essay
Vagle, M. D. (2009). Validity as intended: 'burst forth toward' bridling in phenomenological research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 22(5), 585-605. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390903048784
