Outcome-Based Use of Simulation in Agricultural Sciences: A Systematic Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56103/nactaj.v68i1.166Keywords:
educational technology, learning outcome, simulation, systematic review, agricultureAbstract
Technology is increasingly being integrated into classrooms worldwide to enhance learning outcomes, and simulation technologies are becoming more popular to create realistic scenarios in controlled academic settings. However, simulation studies in agricultural education have been limited, making it difficult to assess the impact of simulation technologies on student learning. To address this literature gap, a systematic literature review of 17 articles was conducted to examine the use of simulation technology in agricultural education. The analysis revealed that simulation technologies were most used in agricultural science sub-disciplines that involve experimentation and practical application. Most studies focused on undergraduates and utilized quantitative research methods, with virtual and augmented reality being the most commonly employed types of simulation. Positive effects of simulation on learning outcomes were reported in most studies, including improved academic achievement, psychological factors such as anxiety, and tracking students’ progress. However, the technology's time-consuming nature and potential for uncomfortable physical conditions like cybersickness were identified as demerits. More rigorous standards were recommended to improve reporting procedures in agricultural education studies with simulation technologies.
Downloads
References
Arroyo, I., Woolf, B. P., Burelson, W., Muldner, K., Rai, D., & Tai, M. (2014). A multimedia adaptive tutoring system for mathematics that addresses cognition, metacognition, and affect. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24(4), 387–426.
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives Book 1: Cognitive domain. New York, NY: David McKay Company.
Bloom, B. S., M. D. Englehart, E. J. Furst, W. H. Hill, and D. R. Krathwohl. (1964). A Handbook of Educational Objectives: The Cognitive Domain. David McKay, New York
* Boyd, B. L., & Murphrey, T. P. (2002). Evaluation of a computer-based, asynchronous activity on student learning of leadership concepts. Journal of Agricultural Education, 43(1), 36-45.
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives Book 1: Cognitive domain. New York, NY: David McKay Company.
* Briggeman, B. C., Detre, J. D., Lansford, N., & Doye, D. (2012). Experiential learning on the internet: A case study of the internet agricultural bank simulation game. NACTA Journal, 56(2), 63-67.
Bulger, M. (2016). Personalized learning: The conversations we're not having (Data & Society Working Paper, pp. 1–29)
*Bunch, J. C., Robinson, J. S., Edwards, M. C., & Antonenko, P. D. (2014). How a Serious Digital Game Affected Students' Animal Science and Mathematical Competence in Agricultural Education. Journal of Agricultural Education, 55(3), 57-71.
Byrd, A. P. (2014). Identifying the effects of human factors and training methods on a weld training program. Retrieved from Iowa State University Digital Repository Graduate Theses and Dissertations. (Paper 13991)
Byun, J., & Joung, E. (2018). Digital game‐based learning for K–12 mathematics education: A meta‐analysis. School Science and Mathematics, 118(3-4), 113-126.
Chang YL, Hou HT, Pan CY, Sung YT, Chang KE (2015) Apply an augmented reality in a mobile guidance to increase sense of place for heritage places. Educ Technol Soc, 18(2):166–178
Cheung, A. C., & Slavin, R. E. (2012). How features of educational technology applications affect student reading outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 7(3), 198-215.
Clarke, E. (2009). Learning outcomes from business simulation exercises: Challenges for the implementation of learning technologies. Education + Training, 51(5/6), 448–459. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910910987246
*Davis, A.L.E., Snyder, L.J.U., Orvis, K. & Knobloch, N.A. (2012). An exploratory study of computer-based instruction utilizing iFARM modules in a college introductory agronomy course. NACTA Journal, 56(4):36-43.
DeKeyser, R. (2015). Skill acquisition theory. In B. VanPatten and J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (2nd ed.) (pp. 94-112). New York, NY: Routledge.
Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009). Affordances and limitations of immersive, participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 7-22.
*Garza, L., Anderson, R.G., Borges, B.D. & Swafford, M. (2022). Determining the professional development needs of students using augmented reality welding systems. AAAE Southern Region Conference; ():217-224.
*Garza, L.B., Anderson, R.G. & Heibel, B. (2022). Determining the professional development needs of students using an augmented reality welding system. AAAE Western Region Conference 2022;(): 163-170.
Garzón, J., Pavón, J., & Baldiris, S. (2019). Systematic review and meta-analysis of augmented reality in educational settings. Virtual Reality, 23(4), 447-459.
Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
* Hasselquist, L., Graves, N.A., Hales, P., Wilson, Alison A. & Durr, T. (2021). Virtual field experience and career and technical education preservice teacher identity development. AAAE National Conference 2021; ():500-514.
*Heibel, B., Anderson, R.G. & Swafford, Marshall (2022). Integrating virtual reality technology into beginning welder training sequences. AAAE National Conference (): 244-257.
*Heibel, B., Anderson, R.G., Swafford, M. & Borges, B.D. (2021). Using Virtual reality to determine the professional development needs of beginning welders. AAAE Western Region Conference, 40():54-60.
Heibel, B. H. (2022). Identifying the Effects of Integrating Virtual Reality Technology into Beginning Welder Training.
Joshi, O., Chapagain, B., Kharel, G., Poudyal, N. C., Murray, B. D., & Mehmood, S. R. (2022). Benefits and challenges of online instruction in agriculture and natural resource education. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(8), 1402–1413. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1725896
Jumaat, N. F., Tasir, Z., Halim, N. D. A., & Ashari, Z. M. (2017). Project-based learning from constructivism point of view. Advanced Science Letters, 23(8), 7904-7906.
Kavanagh, S., Luxton-Reily, A., Wuensche, B., & Plimmer, B. (2017). A systematic review of Virtual Reality in education. Themes in Science & Technology Education, 10(2), 85-119.
Ke, F., & Grabowski, B. (2007). Game playing for mathematics learning: Cooperative or not? British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(2), 249–259.
*Klit, K. J. M., Pedersen, K. S., & Stege, H. (2018). A prospective cohort study of game-based learning by digital simulation of a pig farm to train agriculture students to reduce piglet mortality. Porcine health management, 4(1), 1-8.
Liu, M., Pang, W., Guo, J., & Zhang, Y. (2022). A meta-analysis of the effect of multimedia technology on creative performance. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 8603-8630.
Major, L., Francis, G. A., & Tsapali, M. (2021). The effectiveness of technology‐supported personalised learning in low‐and middle‐income countries: A meta‐analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(5), 1935-1964.
McGaghie, W. C., Issenberg, S. B., Petrusa, E. R., & Scalese, R. J. (2006). Effect of practice on standardized learning outcomes in simulation-based medical education. Medical Education, 40(8), 792–797. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02528.x
O’Donnell, J. M., Decker, S., Howard, V., Levett-Jones, T., & Miller, C. W. (2014). Nln/jeffries simulation framework state of the science project: Simulation learning outcomes. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 10(7), 373–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2014.06.004
Okuda, Y., Bryson, E. O., DeMaria, S., Jacobson, L., Quinones, J., Shen, B., & Levine, A. I. (2009). The utility of simulation in medical education: What is the evidence? : utility of simulation in medical education. Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine: A Journal of Translational and Personalized Medicine, 76(4), 330–343. https://doi.org/10.1002/msj.20127
* Perry, G. A., & Smith, M. F. (2004). A simulation exercise to teach principles of bovine reproductive management. Journal of animal science, 82(5), 1543-1549.
Pulley, J., Bowling, A., Jepsen, D., & Kitchel, T. (2023). School Based-Agricultural Education Teachers’ Lived Experience of Integrating Virtual Reality into their Classroom. Proceedings of the American Association for Agricultural Education Annual Conference 2023, Raleigh, North Carolina. https://aaaeonline.org/resources/Documents/National/2023Meeting/23_AAAE_Proceedings_combined_FINAL.pdf
Sotiriou, S., & Bogner, F. X. (2008). Visualizing the invisible: augmented reality as an innovative science education scheme. Advanced Science Letters, 1(1), 114-122.
*Strong, R., Zoller, J., & Palmer III, J. M. (2022). Evaluating the adoption of virtual reality equine selection and judging curricula: Instructional responses to a covid-19 consequence. Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education, 29(1), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.4148/2831-5960.1025
Talbert, B. A., Croom, B., LaRose, S. E., Vaughn, R., & Lee, J. S. (2022). Foundations of agricultural education. Purdue University Press.
*Trifan, D. (2011). Using Virtual Laboratories in Teaching of Agricultural Sciences. In Conference proceedings of» eLearning and Software for Education «(eLSE) (Vol. 7, No. 02, pp. 356-361). Carol I National Defense University Publishing House.
Virvou, M., Katsionis, G., & Manos, K. (2005). Combining software games with education: Evaluation of educational effectiveness. Educational Technology and Society, 8(2), 54-65.
Wang, Y. (2021). Influence of virtual reality technology on clinical thinking cultivation of medical students. Journal of Healthcare Engineering,, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8004883
* Wells, T., & Miller, G. (2020). The Effect of Virtual Reality Technology on Welding Skill Performance. Journal of Agricultural Education, 61(1), 152-171.
* Wells, T., & Miller, G. (2022). Students' Perspectives on Using Virtual Reality Technology in a University-level Agricultural Mechanics Course. Journal of Agricultural Education, 63(2).
*Wery, J., & Lecoeur, J. (2000). Learning crop physiology from the development of a crop simulation model. Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education, 29(1), 1-7.
*Witt, C., Doerfert, D., Rutherford, T., Murphrey, T., & Edgar, L. (2011). The contribution of selected instructional methods toward graduate student understanding of crisis communication. Journal of Applied Communications, 95(3), 34-45.
Xu, W. W., Su, C. Y., Hu, Y., & Chen, C. H. (2022). Exploring the effectiveness and moderators of augmented reality on science learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31(5), 621-637.
Zhou, F., Duh, H. B. L., & Billinghurst, M. (2008). Trends in augmented reality tracking, interaction, and display: A review of ten years of ISMAR. In Proceedings of the 7th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (pp. 193- 202). IEEE Computer Society.
