Examining Student Perceptions of Engagement and Learning in a Flipped Introductory Agricultural Mechanics Course
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56103/nactaj.v67i1.161Keywords:
agricultural mechanics, flipped classroom, engagement, learningAbstract
Active, student-centered approaches to teaching and learning in university classrooms have been given greater focus in recent years. Consequently, the use of flipped classrooms in American universities has proliferated considerably. Evidence suggests that flipped classrooms have been successfully employed in agricultural coursework, such as university-level agricultural mechanics courses. Theoretically underpinned by Murillo-Zamorano et al.’s (2019) Flipped Classroom in Higher Education model, the purpose of our study was to determine students’ perceptions of their engagement and learning in a flipped introductory-level agricultural mechanics course taught at Illinois State University. We used a valid and reliable electronic instrument to collect data from 61 undergraduate students over the course of four semesters. Our findings indicate that using a flipped classroom design to deliver an introductory-level agricultural mechanics course is a worthy endeavor that can positively impact students’ course experience. We are seeing similar results each semester, which suggest that our students prefer this teaching style over a traditional lecture style. The lead author intends to continue teaching the AGR 130: Introduction to Agricultural Engineering Technology course with a flipped classroom design for the foreseeable future. Our recommendations include: (1) instructors of introductory-level agricultural mechanics courses consider using a flipped classroom approach and (2) replicating our study to further examine this topic.
Downloads
References
Burke, A. S., & Fedorek, B. (2017). Does “flipping” promote engagement?: A comparison of a traditional, online, and flipped class. Active Learning in Higher Education, 18(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417693487
Busato, P., Berruto, R., Zazueta, F. S., & Silva-Lugo, J. L. (2016). Student performance in conventional and flipped classroom learning environments. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 32(5), 509-518. doi:10.13031/aea.32.11298
Connor, N. W., Rubenstein, E. D., DiBenedetto, C. A., Stripling, C. T., Roberts, T. G., & Stedman, N. L. P. (2014). Examining student perceptions of flipping an agricultural teaching methods course. Journal of Agricultural Education, 55(5), 65-77. doi:10.5032/jae.2014.05065
Conroy, A. B., Overson, C. E., & Erickson, P. S. (2019). Alumni perspectives of using a flipped classroom and experiential learning at a university dairy farm. NACTA Journal, 63(2), 299-306. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26769654
Dillman, D, A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode
surveys: The tailored design method (4th edition). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Edgar, D. W., Retallick, M. S., & Jones, D. (2016). Research priority 4: Meaningful, engaged learning in all environments. In T. G. Roberts, A. Harder, & M. T. Brashears. (Eds.), American Association for Agricultural Education national research agenda: 2016-2020. Gainesville, FL: Department of Agricultural Education and Communication.
Figland, W. L., Blackburn, J. J., & Roberts, R. (2020). Undergraduate students’ perceptions of Team-Based Learning during an introductory agricultural mechanics course: A mixed methods study. Journal of Agricultural Education, 61(1), 262-276. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2020.01262
Herren, R. V. (2015). Agricultural mechanics: Fundamentals and applications (7th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Keck, M., Mamo, M., SIndelar, M., Speth, C., & Borwn, S. (2021). Student perception of engagement and learning in a flipped soil nutrient management course. NACTA Journal, 65, 368-374. https://www.nactateachers.org/index.php/volume-65-november-2020-october-2021/3165-student-perception-of-engagement-and-learning-in-a-flipped-soil-nutrient-management-course
Murillo-Zamorano, L. R., Lopez-Sanchez, J. A., & Godoy-Caballero, A. L. (2019). How the flipped classroom affects knowledge, skills, and engagement in higher education: Effects on students’ satisfaction. Computers & Education, 141, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103608
McCubbins, O., Paulsen, T. H., & Anderson, R. G. (2018). Examining student perceptions of their experience in a TBL formatted capstone course. Journal of Agricultural Education, 59(1), 135-152. doi:10.5032/jae.2018.01135
O’Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85-95. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1096751615000056
Parr, B., & Edwards, M. C. (2004). Inquiry-based instruction in secondary agricultural education: Problem solving—An old friend revisited. Journal of Agricultural Education, 45(4), 106-117. doi:10.5032/jae.2004.04106
Phipps, L. J., Osborne, E. W., Dyer, J. E., & Ball, A. (2008). Handbook on agricultural education in public schools (6th ed.). Thomson Delmar Learning.
Radunovich, H. L., & Acharya, S. (2018). If you flip it, will they watch: Case evaluation of a hybrid course. NACTA Journal, 62, 84-88. https://www.nactateachers.org/index.php/vol-62-1-mar-2018/2698-if-you-flip-it-will-they-watch-case-evaluation-of-a-hybrid-course
Rotellar, C., & Cain, J. (2016). Research, perspectives, and recommendations on implementing the flipped classroom. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 80(2), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe80234
Russell, J., Van Horne, S., Ward, A. S., Bettis III, E. A., Sipola, M., Colombo, M., &
Rocheford, M. K. (2016). Large lecture transformation: Adopting evidence-based practices to increase student engagement and performance in an introductory science course. Journal of Geoscience Education, 64(1), 37-51. doi:10.5408/15-084.1
