Students’ Perception of Online Equine Courses and How It Affects Their Learning
STUDENTS’ LEARNING IN ONLINE EQUINE COURSES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56103/nactaj.v67i1.148Keywords:
Equine Science, Online Learning, Online Course DevelopmentAbstract
Courses that are typically hands-on, like equine science, may be more challenging online, but there is a higher demand for online offerings. With an increase in students taking online equine courses, a review of teaching methods was conducted to determine students' preferred teaching tools in online equine courses. The survey was sent out to students at approximately 10 universities that offer equine science courses online that had previously or were currently enrolled in an online equine-focused course and was completely voluntary. Of the 77 respondents, 71 (92%) were female, 6 (8%) males, and the majority (96%) white. The primary reasons students chose an online equine science course was because it fit their schedule better (n = 8; 24.5%) and the course was only offered online (n = 36; 23.2%). Students found videos (n = 62; 92.5%) and readings (n = 57; 85.1%) were extremely or somewhat beneficial teaching methods. Half (n = 34; 50.8%) of the students felt they learned as much in their online courses as in a traditionally taught course. Additionally, students indicated they received a quality education in equine science courses whether taught online (n = 55; 82.1%) or in a traditional in-person (n = 49; 73.1%) format.
Downloads
References
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2016). Online report card tracking online education in the United States. Retrieved from http://onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/onlinereportcard.pdf
Anderson, T. (2004). Towards a theory of online learning. Theory and practice of online learning, 2, 109-119.
Bisciglia, M. & E. MonkTurner (2002). Differences in attitudes between onsite and distance site students in group teleconference courses. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16 (1), 3752.
Coomey, M., & Stephenson, J. (2001). Online learning: it is all about dialogue, involvement, support and control-according to the research. Teaching and learning online: Pedagogies for new technologies, 37-52.
Doyle, W. R. (2009). Online education: The revolution that wasn't. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 41(3), 56-58.
Elfaki, N. K., Abdulraheem, I., & Abdulrahim, R. (2019). Impact of e-learning vs traditional learning on student’s performance and attitude. International Journal of Medical Research & Health Sciences, 8(10), 76-82.
Eom, S. B., Wen, H. J., & Ashill, N. (2006). The determinants of students' perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in university online education: An empirical investigation. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(2), 215-235.
Gadd, M., Hiney, K., & Robinson, J. S. (2018). The technical skills that need to be included in a collegiate equine handling course according to equine industry experts. NACTA Journal, 62(4), 346-352.
Gronqvist, G., Rogers, C., Gee, E., Martinez, A., & Bolwell, C. (2017). Veterinary and equine science students’ interpretation of horse behaviour. Animals, 7(8), 63.
Hannay, M., & Newvine, T. (2006). Perceptions of distance learning: A comparison of online and traditional learning. Journal of online learning and teaching, 2(1), 1-11.
Hoic-Bozic, N., Mornar, V., & Boticki, I. (2008). A blended learning approach to course design and implementation. IEEE transactions on education, 52(1), 19-30. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2007.914945
Hurlbut, A. R. (2018). Online vs. traditional learning in teacher education: a comparison of student progress. American Journal of Distance Education, 32(4), 248-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2018.1509265
Jones, I. S., & Blankenship, D. (2017). Student perceptions of online courses. Research in Higher Education Journal.
Kauffman H. (2015). A review of predictive factors of student success in and satisfaction with online learning. Research in Learning Technology, 23. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v23.26507
Kearns, L. R. (2012). Student assessment in online learning: Challenges and effective practices. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 8(3), 198.
Lavoie, H. A. (2019). Undergraduate Success in Animal Science Courses Based on Demographics, Motivation, and Online Courses.
Lee, S. J., Srinivasan, S., Trail, T., Lewis, D., & Lopez, S. (2011). Examining the relationship among student perception of support, course satisfaction, and learning outcomes in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(3), 158-163.
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies.
Merson, C., Navas Gonzalez, F. J., Orth, E., Adams, A., & McLean, A. (2020). Back in the saddle: student response to remote online equine science classes. Translational animal science, 4(4), txaa218.
Muilenburg, L. Y., & Berge, Z. L. (2005). Student Barriers to online learning: A factor analytic study. Distance education, 26(1), 29-48.
Navarro, P., & Shoemaker, J. (2000). Performance and perceptions of distance learners in cyberspace. American Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 15–35.
Ni, A. Y. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of classroom and online learning: Teaching research methods. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 19(2), 199-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2013.12001730
Rothman, T., Romeo, L., Brennan, M., & Mitchell, D. (2011). Criteria for assessing student satisfaction with online courses. International Journal for e-Learning Security, 1(1-2), 27-32.
Sharpe R, Benfield G & Francis R. Implementing a university E-learning strategy: Levers for change within academic schools. ALT J. 2006; 14(2): 135-151.
Southworth, J. W. (2014). Student Demographics, Academic Performance, and Faculty Perceptions of Equine Students at The Ohio State University. The Ohio State University.
Smalley, S. (2021). New U.S. Data Show Jump in college students' learning online. New U.S. data show jump in college students' learning online.
Strachota, E. (2006). The use of survey research to measure student satisfaction in online courses. In Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education, University of Missouri-St. Louis, MO.
Suen, H. K. (2014). Peer assessment for massive open online courses (MOOCs). International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(3), 312-327.
Swan, K. (2001). Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses. Distance education, 22(2), 306-331.
Tumlin, K., Linares, R., & Schilling, M. (2009). Student motivation and assessment of applied skills in an equine studies program. Journal of Applied Learning in Higher Education, 1, 93-108. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1188548.pdf
Weiss, R. E. (2003). Designing problems to promote higher‐order thinking. New directions for teaching and learning, 2003(95), 25-31.
