Attitudes Toward LGBTQ+ Youth in Agricultural Education: Q Methodology Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56103/nactaj.v68i1.145Keywords:
Q methodology, School-Based Agricultural Education, LGBTQ, inclusionAbstract
Although research indicates school-based agricultural education teachers work to make classrooms more inclusive, some teachers may not feel prepared to support LGBTQ+ youth. The purpose of this study was to explore the attitudes of agricultural education teachers about the inclusion of LGBTQ+ youth in agricultural education. The 38-statement Q set was sorted by 21 Oklahoma agricultural education teachers. The resulting attitudes from the three-factorial solution were labeled: It’s Up to Me, It’s Up to Us, and It’s Up to Leadership. The It’s Up to Me teachers accept the responsibility to create an inclusive environment and program for LGBTQ+ youth. The It’s Up to Us teachers acknowledge the important collective role that students, teachers, and school and university leaders play in creating an inclusive classroom and program. The It’s Up to Leadership teachers acknowledge a need for further education and training in LGBTQ+ inclusion and feel there is too much pressure placed on teachers to be inclusive. The attitudes describe the diverse understandings of how LGBTQ+ inclusion in agricultural education might be implemented and supported with the need for more education and resources in LGBTQ+ inclusion.
Downloads
References
Aragon, S. R., Poteat, V. P., Espelage D. L., & Koenig, B. W. (2014). The influence of peer victimization on educational outcomes for LGBTQ and non-LGBTQ high school students. Journal of LGBT Youth, 11(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/19361653.2014.840761
Austin, A. C., Rice, A. H., & Vincent, S. K. (2021). Examining among secondary agriculture youth. Journal of Agricultural Education, 62(2), 66-82. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae/2021.02066
Brown, S. R. (1980). Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science. Yale University Press.
Brown, S. R. (1993). A primer on Q methodology. Operant Subjectivity, 16(3/4), 91-138. https://doi.org/10.22488/okstate.93.100504
Brown, S. R. (2008). Q methodology. In Lisa M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods (pp. 699-702).
Clark, C. T. (2010). Preparing LGBTQ-allies and combating homophobia in a U.S. teacher education program. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 704-713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.006
Elliott-Engel, J., Amaral, J. R., & Westfall-Rudd, D. (2020). Perspectives on LGBTQ+ inclusion and identify development from a college of agriculture and life sciences. NACTA Journal, 64, 102-112. https://www.nactateachers.org/attachments/article/2987/2019- 0142%20FINAL.pdf
Gay, Lesbian & Straight Education Network (GLSEN). (2019). The 2019 national school climate survey: The experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer youth in our nation’s schools. https://www.glsen.org/sites/default/files/2020-10/NSCS-2019-Executive-Summary-English_1.pdf
Gay, Lesbian & Straight Education Network (GLSEN). (2022). The 2021 national school climate survey: The experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer youth in our nation’s schools. GLSEN. https://www.glsen.org/sites/default/files/2022-10/NSCS-2021-Full-Report.pdf
Lavergne, D. D., Larke, Jr. A., Elbert, C. D., & Jones, W. A. (2011). The benefits and barriers toward diversity inclusion regarding agricultural science teachers in Texas secondary agricultural education programs. The Journal of Agricultural Education, 52(2), 140–150. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2011.02140
McKeown, B., & Thomas, D. (2013). Q methodology. Second Edition. Sage.
Moore, E. A, Ingram, P., & Jones, L. (2001). Attitudes of Michigan agriscience teachers toward diversity. NACTA Journal, 45(1), 32-42. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43765608.pdf
Murray, K. A., Trexler, C. J., & Cannon, C. E. B. (2020). Queering agricultural education research: Challenges and strategies for advancing inclusion. Journal of Agricultural Education, 61(4), 296-316. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2020.04296
National Association of Agricultural Educators (NAAE). (2022). What is agricultural Education? National Association of Agricultural Educators. https://www.naae.org/whatisaged/index.cfm
National FFA Organization. (2020). Official FFA Manual. National FFA Organization.
Russell, S. T., Kosolw, J., Horn, S., & Saewyo, E. (2010). Social policy report: Safe schools for LGBTQ students. Sharing Child and Youth Development knowledge, 24(4). 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2379-3988.2010.tb00065.x
Saebjornsen, S. N., Ellingsen, I. T., Good, J. M. M., & Odegard, A. (2016). Combining a naturalistic and theoretical Q sample approach: An empirical research illustration. Operant Subjectivity: The International Journal of Q Methodology, 38(2), 15-32. https://doi.org/10.15133/j.os.2016.005
Safe Zone Project. (2023). What is Safe Zone? Safe Zone Project. https://thesafezoneproject.com/about/
Stephenson, W. (1935). Technique of Factor Analysis. Nature., 136(3434), 297–297. https://doi.org/10.1038/136297b0
Watts, S., & Stenner, P. (2012). Doing Q methodological research: Theory, method, and interpretation. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Williams Institute. (2019). 4.5% of adults in the US identify as LGBT. UCLA. https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/press/lgbt-adults-us-press-release/
