Examining the Impact of Experiential Learning Activities on Student Performance in an Introductory Animal Science Course
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56103/nactaj.v67i1.125Keywords:
teaching and learning, animal science, hands-on, undergraduate education, student performanceAbstract
The use of experiential learning in agricultural courses within postsecondary institutions has become increasingly important as educators seek to provide students with a meaningful education that increases knowledge acquisition and achievement. Hands-on, experiential learning activities within agricultural sciences, and more directly animal sciences, have previously been used to provide students with experiences that increase performance in courses and overall development throughout a student’s education. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the influence that experiential learning laboratory lessons had on students enrolled in an introduction to animal science lecture course at [University]. Researchers utilized a quasi-experimental study, in which students were placed into one of three groups, depending on the experiential learning lessons that were taught throughout the semester. This was done to determine if students who participated in specific hands-on, experiential learning lessons retained more content knowledge than those who did not receive these lessons, on summative assessments given throughout the semester. Researchers utilized the first quiz scores to examine prior knowledge between groups, and determined that there was no difference. While researchers were unable to determine significance between groups and student content acquisition due to unequal group sizes, researchers determined that students who received experiential learning lessons performed better on average, than those who did not. Researchers identified recommendations for future studies, which include replicating the study with modifications, and repeating the study with two introductory courses simultaneously, in which one course entirely utilizes experiential learning lessons and the other course utilizes traditional review sessions. Additionally, researchers recommended practitioners integrate blending experiential learning opportunities and traditional lecture and review when teaching introductory courses.
Downloads
References
Andelt, L. L., Barrett, L. A., & Bosshamer, B. K. (1997). Employer assessment of the skill preparation of students from the College of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Nebraska-Lincoln: Implications for teaching and curriculum. Nacta Journal, 41(4), 47-53.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.
Buchanan, D. S. (2008). ASAS Centennial Paper: Animal science teaching: A century of excellence. Journal of Animal Science, 86(12), 3640–3646. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2008-1366.
Deslauriers, J., Rudd, R., Westfall-Rudd, D., & Splan, R. (2016). The Critical Need for Merging Educational Learning Theories with Experiential Learning Programs in Animal Agriculture: A Literature Review. NACTA Journal, 60(3), 307-312. https://doi.org10.2307/nactajournal.60.3.307.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Macmillan Publishing Company., Inc.
Easterly, R. G., Warner, A., Myers, B., Lamm, A., & Telg, R. (2017). Skills Students Need in the Real World: Competencies Desired by Agricultural and Natural Resources Industry Leaders. Journal of Agricultural Education, 58(4), 225–239. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2017.04225.
Erickson, M. G., Guberman, D., Zhu, H., & Karcher, E. (2019). Interest and active learning techniques in an introductory animal science course. North American Colleges and Teachers of Agriculture, 63, 293. https://www.nactateachers.org/attachments/article/2872/34%20NACTA%20Journal%20MS2018_0062.pdf.
Erickson, M. G., Marks, D., & Karcher, E. (2020a). Characterizing student engagement with hands-on, problem-based, and lecture activities in an introductory college course. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 8(1), 138–153. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.8.1.10.
Erickson, M. G., Ranathunga, S. D., & Wattiaux, M. A. (2020b). Animal sciences undergraduate education since the ASAS Centennial: A national survey and scoping review. Translational Animal Science, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaa202.
Estepp, C., & Roberts, T. (2011). A Model for Transforming the Undergraduate Learning Experience in Colleges of Agriculture. NACTA Journal, 55(3), 28-32. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/nactajournal.55.3.28.
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111.
Garton, B. (1997). Agriculture teachers and students: In concert or conflict? Journal of Agricultural Education, 38(1), 38-45. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.1997.01038.
Hidi, S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000). Motivating the Academically Unmotivated: A Critical Issue for the 21st Century. Review of Educational Research, 70(2), 151–179. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070002151.
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.
Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
National Research Council. (2009). Transforming agricultural education for a changing world. The National Academies Press.
Marshall, T. T., Hoover, T. S., Reiling, B. A., & Downs, K. M. (1998). Experiential learning in the animal sciences: effect of 13 years of a beef cattle management practicum. Journal of Animal Science, 76(11), 2947. https://doi.org/10.2527/1998.76112947x.
Miettinen, R. (2000). The concept of experiential learning and John Dewey's theory of reflective thought and action. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 19(1), 54–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/026013700293458.
Reiling, B. A., Marshall, T. T., Brendemuhl, J. H., McQuagge, J. A., & Umphrey, J. E. (2003). Experiential learning in the animal sciences: Development of a multispecies large-animal management and production practicum. Journal of Animal Science, 81(12), 3202–3210. https://doi.org/10.2527/2003.81123202x.
Roberts, G. (2006). A philosophical examination of experiential learning theory for agricultural educators. Journal of Agricultural Education, 47(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2006.01017.
Rotgans, J.I. and Schmidt, H. G. (2011). Situational interest and academic achievement in the active-learning classroom. Learning and Instruction, 21(1), 58-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.11.001.
Schunk, D. (2020). Learning theories: An educational perspective (8th ed.). Pearson
Whittington, M. S., & Raven, M. R. (1995). Learning and teaching styles of student teachers in the northwest. Journal of Agricultural Education, 36(4), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.1995.04010.
Yuretich, R. F., Khan, S. A., Leckie, R. M., & Clement, J. J. (2001). Active-Learning Methods to Improve Student Performance and Scientific Interest in a Large Introductory Oceanography Course. Journal of Geoscience Education, 49(2), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-49.2.111.
