Engaging Students Through the Process of Self-grading

Authors

  • Lacie Peterson Utah State University

Keywords:

self-grading, student enagagement, case studies

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Deslauriers, L., McCarty, L. S., Miller, K., Callaghan, K. and Kestin, G. 2019. Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 116(39), 19251-19257.

Harman, T., Bertrand, B., Greer, A., Pettus, A., Jennings, J., Wall-Bassett, E., and Babatunde, O. T. (2015). Case-based learning facilitates critical thinking in undergraduate nutrition education: students describe the big picture. J Acad Nutr Diet, 115(3), 378-388.

Jackson, M. A., Tran, A., Wenderoth, M. P., & Doherty, J. H. (2018). Peer vs. Self-Grading of Practice Exams: Which Is Better? CBE Life Sci Educ, 17(3), es44.

Wagner, M. L., Suh, D. C., & Cruz, S. (2011). Peer- and self-grading compared to faculty grading. Am J Pharm Educ, 75(7), 130.

Published

07/28/2023

How to Cite

Peterson, L. (2023). Engaging Students Through the Process of Self-grading. NACTA Journal, 66(1). Retrieved from https://nactajournal.org/index.php/nactaj/article/view/12

Issue

Section

Teaching Tips