Virtual Soil Science Laboratory Sessions: Delivery and Student Perceptions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56103/nactaj.v68i1.102Keywords:
distance learning, soil science teaching, virtual laboratoryAbstract
Laboratory classes effectively enhance student understanding and appreciation of course concepts. With course delivery suddenly shifted into the online format due to the COVID-19 pandemic, four laboratory exercises in each of two introductory-level soil science courses were converted into virtual sessions delivered in the form of student-accessible videos. Each laboratory video included a pre-lab discussion, demonstrations of a process or experiment, prompts to answer questions and record data, and/or explanation of relevant calculations. The online link to the video was provided in a laboratory guide which doubled as the report document that students submitted online. Semester-end surveys (n=130) reveal that at least 97% of students agreed or strongly agreed that virtual labs successfully demonstrated key processes and at least 96% thought that the virtual labs enhanced student understanding of soil science concepts. Over 90% of students considered the virtual labs as successful substitutes for hands-on exercises in COVID19-affected semesters. The absence of instructors who could immediately address questions and classmates to discuss results were the two main challenges. Students liked the ability to review the video if things were unclear the first time. While it has its limitations, virtual lab sessions were perceived as successful substitutes to in-person laboratory activities.
Downloads
References
Abit, S. M., Curl, P., Lasquites, J. J., & MacNelly, B. (2018). Delivery and student perceptions of drive-through laboratory sessions in an introductory-level soil science course. Natural Sciences Education, 47, 1-8.
Aleman, R., Duball, C., Schwyter, A., & Vaughan, K. (2021). Remote delivery of field experiences in soil sciences. Natural Sciences Education, DOI: 10.1002/nse2.20049.
Altowaiji, S., Haddadin, R., Campos, P., Sorn, S., Gonzales, L., Villafane, S.M., & Groves, M.N. (2021). Measuring the effectiveness of online preparation videos and questions in the second s emester general chemistry laboratory. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, DOI: 10.1039/d0rp00240b.
De Jong, T., Linn, M. C. & Zacharia, Z. C. (2013). Physical and virtual laboratories in science and engineering education. Science, 340, 305-308.
De Vries, L. E. & May, M. 2019. Virtual laboratory simulation in the education of laboratory technicians-motivation and study intensity. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 47(3), 257-262.
Deslauriers, L., McCarty, L. S., Miller, K., Callaghan, K. & Kestin, G. (2019). Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(39), 19251-19257.
Durand, M. T., Restini, C. B. A., Wolff, A. C. D., Faria, M., Couto, L. B. & Bestetti, R. B. (2019). Students’ perception of animal or virtual laboratory in physiology practical classes in PBL medical hybrid curriculum. Advances in Physiology Education, 43, 451-457.
Dyrberg, N. R., Treusch, A. H. & Wiegand, C. (2017). Virtual laboratories in science education: students’ motivation and experiences in two tertiary biology courses. Journal of Biological Education, 51(4), 358-374.
Eick, M. J. & Burgholzer, R. W. (2000). Design and implementation of interactive online tutorials for introductory soil science courses. Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education, 29, 149-154.
Elliott, S. J. & Kukula, E. P. (2007). The challenges associated with laboratory-based distance education. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 30(1), 37-42.
Faour, M. A. & Ayoubi, Z. (2018). The effect of using virtual laboratory on grade 10 students’ conceptual understanding and their attitudes towards physics. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 4(1), 54-68.
Field, D. J., Koppi, A. J., Jarrett, L. E., Abbott, L. K., Cattle, S. R., Grant, C. D., McBratney, A. B., Menzies, N. W., & Weatherley, A. J. (2011). Soil science teaching principles. Geoderma, DOI:10.1016/J.GEODERMA.2011.09.017.
Flowers, L. O. (2011). Investigating the effectiveness of virtual laboratories in an undergraduate biology course. The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning, 7(2), 110-116.
Gunawan, G., Nisrina, N., Suranti, N. M. Y., Herayanti, L. & Rahmatiah, R. (2018). Virtual laboratory to improve students’ conceptual understanding in physics. Learning Journal of Physics, DOI :10.1088/1742-6596/1108/1/012049.
Hawkins, I. & Phelps, A. J. (2013). Virtual laboratory vs. traditional laboratory: which is more effective for teaching electrochemistry?. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14, 516-523.
Hofstein, A. & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2007). The laboratory in science education: the state of the art. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(2), 105-107.
Hofstein, A. & Lunetta, V. N. (2003). The laboratory in science education: foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88, 28-54.
Kapici, H. O., Akcay, H., & de Jong, T. (2019). Using hands-on and virtual laboratories alone or together-which works better for acquiring knowledge and skills?. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28, 231-250.
Ma, J. & Nickerson, J. V. (2006). Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories: a comparative literature review. ACM Computing Surveys, 38(3), 1-24.
O’Malley, J. & McCraw, H. (1999). Students’ perceptions of distance learning, online learning and the traditional classroom. Journal of Distance Learning Administration Contents, 2(4)
Owen, R. K., Anderson, A., Bhandari, A., Clark, K., Davis, M., Dere, A., Jelenski, N., Moorberg, C., Osterloh, K., Presley, D., Turk, J., & Young, R. (2021). Evaluating student attitudes and learning at remote collegiate soil judging events. Natural Sciences Education, 50, e20065. https://doi.org/10.1002/nse2.20065
Pomerantz, J. & Brooks, D. C. (2017). ECAR Study of Faculty and Information Technology. Research Report, Louisville, CO. EDUCAUSE Center for Analysis and Research, 43p.
Ramasundaram, V., Grunwald, S., Mangeot, A., Comerford, N. B. & Bliss, C. M. (2005). Development of an environmental virtual field laboratory. Computers & Education, 45, 21-34.
Ranjan, A. (2017). Effect of virtual laboratory on development of concepts and skills in physics. Ohio Journal of Science, 115(2), 48-52.
Reeves, S. M. & Crippen, K. J. (2021). Virtual laboratories in undergraduate science and engineering courses: a systematic review, 2009-2019. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30, 16-30.
Reuter, R. J. (2007). Introductory soils online: an effective way to get online students in the field. Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education. 36, 139-146.
Reuter, R. J. (2009). Online versus in the classroom: student success in a hands-on lab class. The American Journal of Distance Education, 23, 151-162.
Schulze, D. G., Rahmani, S. R., Minai, J. O., Johnston, C. T., Fulk-Bringman, S. S., Scott, J. R., Kong, N. N., Li, Y. S., & Mashtare Jr., M. L. (2021). Virtualizing soil science field trips. Natural Sciences Education, 50, e20046. https://doi.org/10.1002/nse2.20046
Sherrer, S. M. (2020). A virtual laboratory module exploring photosynthesis during COVID-19. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 48, 659-661.
Tobin, K. (1990). Research on science laboratory activities: in pursuit of better questions and answers to improve learning. School Science and Mathematics, 90(5), 403-418.
Toth, E. E., Morrow B. L. & Ludvico, L. R. (2009). Designing blended inquiry learning in a laboratory context: a study of incorporating hands-on and virtual laboratories. Innovative Higher Education, 33, 333-344.
Wolters, B., & Lepcha, I. (2021). Unexpected shift to introductory soil field activity at home: Teacher and student experience. Natural Sciences Education, 2021;50e20059. https://doi.org/10.1002/nse2.20059
Zacharia, Z. C. (2007). Comparing and combining real and virtual experimentation: an effort to enhance students’ conceptual understanding of electric circuits. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00215.x
