Student Feedback on Use of Breakout Rooms

Authors

  • Cheryl Wachenheim
  • Mr.
  • Erik Hanson

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56103/nactaj.v67i1.100

Keywords:

breakout rooms, group learning, online teaching

Abstract

The widespread use of video platforms has enriched and expanded options for synchronous learning for students attending class remotely including use of breakout rooms as a venue for peer-to-peer discussion. Although groupwork has long been used in face-to-face classes and there exists abundant research on its benefits, research on the use of breakout rooms as a venue for groupwork including students not physically in the classroom is scant. An end-of-term survey was administered to students in two classes taught using a HyFlex system where the instructor was physically present in the classroom with some students while other students participated remotely. Primary characteristics students liked about breakout rooms are that they facilitate student-to-student interaction, especially important during the pandemic, allow peer-to-peer learning and assistance, and keep student attention and interest. Primary characteristics noted as those disliked include lack of participation, that they can be awkward, and when they are poorly designed. Students found breakout rooms most productive when instructors provided clear guidance, students were held accountable for the conversation held in the breakout room, and all students participated.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chandler, K. (2016). Using Breakout Rooms in Synchronous Online Tutorials. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 4(3), 16-23. https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v4i3.216

Chang, Yunjeong and Peggy Brickman. (2018). When group work doesn’t work: Insights from students. Life Sciences Education, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-09-0199

Gijlers, H. & De Jong, T. (2005). The relation between prior knowledge and students’

collaborative discovery learning processes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(3),

-282. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20056

Fitzgibbons, L., Kruelski, N., & Young, R. (2021). Breakout Rooms in an E-Learning Environment. http://hdl.handle.net/1802/36358 (accessed October 5, 2022).

Hollister B, Nair P, Hill-Lindsay S and Chukoskie L (2022) Engagement

in Online Learning: Student Attitudes and Behavior During COVID-19. Frontiers in Education, 7:851019. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.851019.

Lougheed, J., Kirkland, J., & Newton, G. (2012). Using Breakout Groups as an Active Learning Technique in a Large Undergraduate Nutrition Classroom at the University of Guelph. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2012.2.6

Oakley, B., Felder, R. M., Brent, R., & Elhajj, I. (2004). Turning Student Groups into Effective Teams. Journal of Student-Centered Learning, 2(1), 9-34.

Wachenheim, Cheryl, Erik Hanson, and Abiodun Idowu. Student feedback on the use of breakout rooms. North American College Teachers of Agriculture Annual Meeting, June 20-June 23, 2022.

Downloads

Published

06/07/2023

How to Cite

Wachenheim, C., Idowu, A., & Hanson, E. (2023). Student Feedback on Use of Breakout Rooms. NACTA Journal, 67(1). https://doi.org/10.56103/nactaj.v67i1.100

Issue

Section

Manuscripts