An Assessment of Changes in Undergraduate Students’ Animal Science Knowledge Throughout an Introductory-level Course
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56103/nactaj.v70i1.276Keywords:
animal science, knowledge, reflection, changeAbstract
Introductory-level animal science courses are taught at universities across the United States. These courses’ foci typically include a broad range of topics, such as animal species and breeds, animal handling, and animal care. Such courses also provide opportunities to incorporate experiential learning practices, such as reflection. Conceptually undergirded by Boud et al.’s (1985) model of reflection, we used a written reflective tool (i.e., a Know-Want to Know-Learned [K-W-L] chart) within two different semesters’ introductory-level animal science courses taught at [UNIVERSITY]. We asked the undergraduate students enrolled in these course sections to complete their K-W-L charts at the beginning and at the end of their respective semesters. We used content analysis and coding procedures to analyze and organize our data. We found that students often entered into the [COURSE] with at least some animal-related background, often sought to learn more about cattle, and most frequently indicated that they learned about animal reproduction and genetics as a result of their course experience. We recommend that our study be replicated with other populations of students enrolled in animal science courses both at [UNIVERSITY] and elsewhere. We emphasize that our findings should not be generalized beyond the students included in our study.
Downloads
References
Colbath, S. A., & Morrish, D. G. (2010). What do college freshmen know about agriculture? An evaluation of agricultural literacy. NACTA Journal, 54(3), 14-17. http://www.jstor.org/stable/nactajournal.54.3.14
Coleman, B. M., Bunch, J. C., Roberts, T. G., Israel, G. D., & Wysocki, A. F. (2023). The effects of reflection and transfer on undergraduate animal science students’ knowledge. Journal of Experiential Education, 46(4), 513-533. https://doi.org/10.1177/10538259231159647
Dale, C., Robinson, J. S., & Edwards, M. C. (2017). An assessment of the agricultural literacy of incoming freshmen at a land-grant university. NACTA Journal, 61(1), 7-13. https://www.jstor.org/stable/90004098
Deslauriers, J. L., Rudd, R. D., Westfall-Rudd, D. M., Splan, R. K. (2016). The critical need for merging educational learning theories with experiential learning programs in animal agriculture: A literature review. NACTA Journal, 60(3), 307-312. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/nactajournal.60.3.307.pdf
Drisko, J. W., & Maschi, T. (2016). Content analysis. Oxford University Press.
Estepp, C. M., & Roberts, T. G. (2011). A model for uransforming the undergraduate learning experience in colleges of agriculture. NACTA Journal, 55(3), 28-32. http://www.jstor.org/stable/nactajournal.55.3.28
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.
Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.
Malone, C. J., Rickard, J. W., & Tudor, K. W. (2016). Integrating experiential learning into animal science curriculum through a hands-on Beef cattle management and marketing contest. Journal of Animal Science, 94(2), 187. https://doi.org/10.2527/msasas2016-399
Marshall, T. T., Hoover, T. S., Reiling, B. A., & Downs, K. M. (1998). Experiential learning in the animal sciences: Effect of 13 years of a beef cattle management practicum. Journal of Animal Science, 76(11), 2947-2952. https://doi.org/10.2527/1998.76112947x
Paudyal, S., Frenzel, L., & Dunlap, K. (2021). Influencing perceptions in non-animal science majors: Impact of a high enrollment, asynchronous core curriculum science general animal science course. Journal of Animal Science, 99(2), 45. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skab096.083
Phipps, L. J., Osborne, E. W., Dyer, J. E., & Ball, A. (2008). Handbook on agricultural education in public schools (6th ed.). Thomson Delmar Learning.
Rayfield, J., Murphrey, T. P., Skaggs, C., & Shafer, J. (2013). Factors that influence student decisions to enroll in a College of Agriculture and Life Sciences. NACTA Journal, 57(1), 88-83. http://www.jstor.org/stable/nactajournal.57.1.88
Reiling, B. A., Marshall, T. T., Brendemuhl, J. H., McQuaggue, J. A., & Umphrey, J. E. (2003). Experiential learning in the animal sciences: Development of a multispecies large-animal management and production practicum. Journal of Animal Science, 81(12), 3202-3210. https://doi.org/10.2527/2003.81123202x
Scott, J., Rubenstein, E., Scott, J. A., McDonald, J. J., & Pringle, T. D. (2023). Examining how experiential learning impacts performance in an introductory animal science course. NACTA Journal, 67(1), 201-209. https://doi.org/10.56103/nactaj.v67i1.125
Smalley, S. W., & Rank, B. D. (2019). Preservice teacher perceptions of the role an agriculture teacher during their early field experience. Journal of Agricultural Education, 60(2), 99-108. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2019.02099
Sterle, J. A., Tyler, H. D., & Daniel, J. (2016). Beyond veterinary school: Helping animal science students explore other career opportunities. Journal of Animal Science, 94(5), 858-859. https://doi.org/10.2527/jam2016-1763
Stripling, C. T., & Ricketts, J. C. (2016). Research priority 3: Sufficient scientific and professional workforce that addresses the challenges of the 21st century. In T. G. Roberts, A. Harder, & M. T. Brashears. (Eds.), American Association for Agricultural Education national research agenda: 2016-2020. Department of Agricultural Education and Communication.
Whitehair, R. L., Schramm, K. R. S., Wells, T., & Hainline, M. S. (2020). Preservice teachers’ conceptualizations of agricultural mechanics. Journal of Agricultural Education, 61(3), 60-74. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2020.03060