READY, SET, CLICK! EXPLORING ONLINE LEARNING IN AGRICULTURE STUDENTS BY CLASS FORMAT, GENDER, AND ACADEMIC LEVEL

READY, SET, CLICK! EXPLORING ONLINE LEARNING IN AGRICULTURE STUDENTS BY CLASS FORMAT, GENDER, AND ACADEMIC LEVEL

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56103/nactaj.v70i1.251

Keywords:

online learning readiness, agricultural education, virtual classroom, self-directed learning, self-control

Abstract

This study examines students’ perceptions of their online learning readiness, with a focus on interactions between in-person and online course formats, gender, and academic level. Utilizing the Online Learning Readiness Scale (OLRS), which measures computer/internet self-efficacy, self-directed learning, learner control, motivation for learning, and online communication self-efficacy, this study aims to understand students’ perceived preparedness for the evolving online learning environment. The study was conducted with 79 undergraduate students enrolled in an online and in-person agricultural education, leadership, and communication course from Fall 2023 to Spring 2024. Self-directed learning emerged as a perceived strength, while learner control was identified as a potential area for improvement. Gender differences were observed, with females scoring higher in self-directed learning, motivation for learning, and online communication self-efficacy. Additionally, the interaction between academic level and course format had a significant impact on scores for self-directed learning and learner control. These findings suggest the importance of tailoring online courses to address learner control issues, recognizing gender-specific needs, and adapting courses based on student level and delivery format. These considerations will help educators foster a more inclusive, effective, and supportive online learning experience for all students. Online learning is instruction meant to support learning and delivered via a digital device with access to the Internet (Clark & Mayer, 2023; Hoi et al., 2021). To comply with the social distancing measures of the COVID-19 pandemic, many higher education institutions shut down their campuses and transitioned to online learning to continue offering educational services (Toquero, 2020). During this troublesome time, online learning became popular due to its ability to offer more flexible access to material and teaching at any time, from any location, and a feasible alternative to combat the lack of resources, facilities, and equipment in higher education institutions (Castro & Tumibay, 2021). The unexpected and unprecedented transition from in-person to online learning was rough, and the ease of this transition became a measure of organizational agility (Tribble et al., 2022). The transition to online learning exposed resource shortages and student marginalization as limited internet access and outdated technology hindered responsiveness and engagement (Zhong, 2020). Higher levels of computer and communication skills and motivation are needed for online learning than for traditional classroom learning (Cuadrado-García et al., 2010; Hartnett, 2016; Sun et al., 2020), making it a challenge for many students. It is not correct to assume that all Gen Zers—people who were born between 1990-2010 that make up around 32% of the world’s population—(Bulanda & Vavrecka, 2019; Van der Bergh & Behrer, 2016; Van der Bergh et al., 2024), are proficient with technology. Despite Gen Z being the first generation to grow up with constant access to the internet (Seemiller & Grace, 2016), it does not imply that Gen Zers are automatically prepared for online learning. Academic institutions are under more pressure to update their curricula, and implementing innovative teaching techniques and tactics must be a top priority (Toquero, 2020). Therefore, measures must be developed to assess students' readiness for this changing learning environment (Chung et al., 2020). Mailizar et al. (2020) urged upcoming researchers to assess how students view online learning, identify the difficulties they encounter, and, above all, amplify their voices on a matter that directly impacts students. In other words, Mailizar et al. (2020) referred to students’ online learning readiness, the capacity to communicate with peers, and technical proficiency in word processing and Learning Management Systems software (LMS) (Morrison, 2003; Yu, 2014). There is a dearth of literature regarding students’ online learning readiness (Tang et al., 2021), especially for agriculture majors. Evaluating online learning readiness can help instructors create better online courses and direct students toward rewarding online learning experiences (Demir Kaymak & Horzum, 2013). In-person classes cannot solely be digitalized for online learning; these classes need to be redesigned to promote students’ individual and collaborative learning with activities specifically designed for virtual platforms (Tang et al., 2021). A crucial aspect of achieving an efficient and successful online learning environment is to measure students’ online learning readiness and design the course considering their strengths and weaknesses (Hung et al., 2010). This study assessed students' online learning readiness to ascertain which areas students struggle with the most and how their level of preparedness is influenced by class format, gender, and academic level.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Patricia Marie Cordero-Irizarry, Mississippi State University

Doctoral Candidate

Agricultural & Extension Education

School of Human Sciences

Justin R. Hall, Mississippi State University

Instructor

Agricultural & Extension Education 

School of Human Sciences

Carley C. Morrison, Mississippi State University

Associate Professor

Agricultural Education, Leadership, and Communication

School of Human Sciences

Kirk A. Swortzel, Mississippi State University

Professor & Graduate Coordinator

Agricultural & Extension Education

School of Human Sciences

References

Adnan, M., & Anwar, K. (2020). Online learning amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Students' perspectives. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 2(1), 45-51. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ed606496

Asampana, I., Akwetey, H. M., Ocra, B., Nyame, J. Y., Akanferi, A. A., & Tanye, H. A. (2024). Factors motivating the adoption of virtual learning environments in higher education. Is gender relevant? The Scientific Temper, 15(01), 137-148.

Atkinson, J., & Blankenship, R. (2009). Online learning readiness of undergraduate college students: A comparison between male and female students. The Journal of Learning in Higher Education, 5, 49-56

Bétrancourt, M., & Benetos, K. (2018). Why and when does instructional video facilitate learning? A commentary to the special issue “developments and trends in learning with instructional video”. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 471-475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.035

Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, race, and gender in middle school science. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 7(4).

Bulanda, I., & Vavrecka, V. (2019). Perception of the non-commercial advertising of generation Z from Slovakia. In Economic and Social Development: Book of Proceedings (pp. 455-465).

Castro, M. D. B., & Tumibay, G. M. (2021). A literature review: efficacy of online learning courses for higher education institution using meta-analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1367-1385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10027-z

Chung, E., Noor, N. M., & Mathew, V. N. (2020). Are you ready? An assessment of online learning readiness among university students. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 9(1), 301-317.

Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2023). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. John Wiley & Sons.

Cuadrado-García, M., Ruiz-Molina, M. E., & Montoro-Pons, J. D. (2010). Are there gender differences in e-learning use and assessment? Evidence from an interuniversity online project in Europe. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 367-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.027

Demir Kaymak, Z., & Horzum, M. B. (2013). Relationship between online learning readiness and structure and interaction of online learning students. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 13(3), 1792-1797. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1017736

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104

Forson, I. K., & Vuopala, E. (2019). Online learning readiness: Perspective of students enrolled in distance education in Ghana. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-learning, 7(4), 277-294.

Furumo, K., & Pearson, J. M. (2007). Gender-based communication styles, trust, and satisfaction in virtual teams. Journal of Information, Information Technology & Organizations, 2.

Hartnett, M. (2016). The Importance of Motivation in Online Learning. In: Motivation in Online Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0700-2_2

Hoi, S. C., Sahoo, D., Lu, J., & Zhao, P. (2021). Online learning: A comprehensive survey. Neurocomputing, 459, 249-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2021.04.112

Hung, M. L., Chou, C., Chen, C. H., & Own, Z. Y. (2010). Learner readiness for online learning: Scale development and student perceptions. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1080-1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.004

Korlat, S., Kollmayer, M., Holzer, J., Lüftenegger, M., Pelikan, E. R., Schober, B., & Spiel, C. (2021). Gender differences in digital learning during COVID-19: Competence beliefs, intrinsic value, learning engagement, and perceived teacher support. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 637776. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.637776

Lin, B., & Hsieh, C. T. (2001). Web-based teaching and learner control: A research review. Computers & Education, 37(3-4), 377-386.

Mailizar, A., Maulina, S., & Bruce, S. (2020). Secondary school mathematics teachers' views on e-learning implementation barriers during the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of Indonesia. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(7). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1272650

Martin, F., Stamper, B., & Flowers, C. (2020). Examining student perception of readiness for online learning: importance and confidence. Online Learning, 24(2), 38-58.

Monil, M., Omar, N. H., Jusoh, M. Z., Kee, S. N. A. A., Bakrin, S., & Awang, D. A. (2022). From F2F to virtual class: Does online learning readiness matters to course satisfaction and academic performance? International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(8), 193 – 211. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i8/14312

Morrison, D. (2003). E-learning strategies: How to get implementation and delivery right the first time. John Wiley & Sons.

Muhtar, A. A. (2021). Gender and communication style: Overview on face-to-face communication and online text (Whatsapp Group). AL-MAIYYAH: Media Transformasi Gender dalam Paradigma Sosial Keagamaan, 14(1), 1-13.

Naji, K. K., Du, X., Tarlochan, F., Ebead, U., Hasan, M. A., & Al-Ali, A. K. (2020). Engineering students' readiness to transition to emergency online learning in response to COVID-19: Case of Qatar. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(10), 1886. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8474

Nasir, N. F. W. M., Ab Manan, N. A., Ab Rahim, P. R. M. A., & Azizan, N. (2020). A study on student readiness of online learning among adult distance learners. ESLA International Journal for educational Sciences and Language Arts, 1(2), 31-41.

Rafique, G. M., Mahmood, K., Warraich, N. F., & Rehman, S. U. (2021). Readiness for Online Learning during COVID-19 pandemic: A survey of Pakistani LIS students. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(3), 102346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102346

Rovai, A.P., Baker, J.D., & Ponton, M.K. Social science research design and statistics: A practitioner’s guide to research methods and IBM SPSS analysis (2nd ed.). Watertree Press.

Sakal, O.M. (2017). Readiness levels of students in online learning: Examination according to demographic characteristics. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research, 18(30), 81-102

Scheiter, K., & Gerjets, P. (2007). Learner control in hypermedia environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 285-307. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10648-007-9046-3

Seemiller, C., & Grace, M. (2016). Generation Z goes to college. Jossey Bass.

Sun, B., Mao, H., & Yin, C. (2020). Male and female users’ differences in online technology community based on text mining. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 517714. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00806

Toquero, C. M. (2020). Challenges and opportunities for higher education amid the COVID-19 pandemic: The Philippine context. Pedagogical Research, 5(4). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1263557

Van den Bergh, J., & Behrer, M. (2016). How cool brands stay hot: Branding to Generations Y and Z. Kogan Page.

Van den Bergh, J., De Pelsmacker, P., & Worsley, B. (2024). Beyond labels: segmenting the Gen Z market for more effective marketing. Young Consumers, 25(2), 188-210. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-03-2023-1707

Warner, D., Christie, C., & Choy, S. (1998). The readiness of the VET sector for flexible delivery including on-line learning: final draft. https://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv:41484

Yu, T. (2014). An exploratory factor analysis and reliability analysis of the student online learning readiness (SOLR) instrument (Publication No. 1683135618) [Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

Yu, Q., Gou, J., Li, Y., Pi, Z., & Yang, J. (2023). Introducing support for learner control: Temporal and organizational cues in instructional videos. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13408

Zhong, R. (2020, March 17). The coronavirus exposes education’s digital divide. Retrieved from The New York Times: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/17/technology/china-schools-coronavirus.html

Additional Files

Published

05/01/2026

How to Cite

Cordero-Irizarry, P. M., Hall, J. R., Morrison, C. C., & Swortzel, K. A. (2026). READY, SET, CLICK! EXPLORING ONLINE LEARNING IN AGRICULTURE STUDENTS BY CLASS FORMAT, GENDER, AND ACADEMIC LEVEL : READY, SET, CLICK! EXPLORING ONLINE LEARNING IN AGRICULTURE STUDENTS BY CLASS FORMAT, GENDER, AND ACADEMIC LEVEL . NACTA Journal, 70(1). https://doi.org/10.56103/nactaj.v70i1.251

Issue

Section

Manuscripts