Science Communication Training, Skills, and Importance Among Agricultural, Food, and Environmental Scientists

Authors

  • Rebecca Swenson University of Minnesota
  • Corissa Marson University of Minnesota

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56103/nactaj.v69i1.222

Keywords:

Science communication, agricultural communications, Survey, Training, Skills

Abstract

Science communication practice aligns well with land-grant missions, can increase public understanding of science disciplines and institutional work, and has the potential to be a key part of agricultural, food, and environmental science programs. The purpose of this study is to explore perceptions of science communication’s importance, skill needs, and training interests among faculty and graduate students in agricultural, food, and environmental science disciplines at land-grant institutions. Survey participants describe time currently spent, time desired, perceived costs, and potential motivations for initiating or devoting ongoing time to science communication training and practice. Potential skills that are valuable to include in science communicating curriculum and training workshops are shared. The study identifies key similarities and differences between students and faculty participants and offers potential suggestions for how to approach science communication skill development within the agricultural, food, and environmental sciences.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Corissa Marson, University of Minnesota

Corissa Marson is a Ph.D. Candidate in the Department of Applied Economics at the University of Minnesota. Her current research interests are the effect of poverty and stress on decision making, uncertainty, information avoidance, and science communication. Her research is interdisciplinary and unites economics, neuroscience, and psychology. 

References

References

Brownell, S., Price, J., & Steinman, L. (2013). Science Communication to the General Public: Why We Need to Teach Undergraduate and Graduate Students this Skill as Part of Their Formal Scientific Training. J Undergrad Neurosci Educ., 12(1):E6-E10.

Burns, T. W., O'Connor, D. J., & Stocklmayer, S. M. (2003). Science communication: a contemporary definition. Public understanding of science, 12(2), 183-202.

Cologna, V., Kotcher, J., Mede, N. G., Besley, J. C., Maibach, E., & Oreskes, N. (2023). Trust in climate science and climate scientists: A qualitative review. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/hj2xk

Conover, W.J. (1999). Practical Nonparametric Statistics. Wiley

Hattie, J., Hodis, F. A., & Kang, S. H. (2020). Theories of motivation: Integration and ways forward. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101865.

Masambuka-kanchewa, F. (2023). Perceptions of Scientists before and after Taking a Graduate Level Science Communication Course: Graduate Students’ Perceptions of a Scientist . NACTA Journal, 66 (1). Retrieved from https://nactajournal.org/index.php/nactaj/article/view/30

McLeod-Morin, A., Telg, R., and Rumble, J. (2020) "Describing Interdisciplinary Agricultural Research Center Directors’ Perceptions of Science Communication Through Goals and Beliefs," Journal of Applied Communications, 104 (1). https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2300

Miller, J., Large, M., Rucker, K., Shoulders, K., and Buck, E. (2015) "Characteristics of U.S. Agricultural Communications Undergraduate Programs," Journal of Applied Communications. 99(4). https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.1063

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM). (2017). Communicating science effectively: A research agenda. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/23674

Parrella, J., Leggette, H., Kainer, M., and Bush, M. (2023) "Exploring the Applicability of the Science Communication Research Agenda to Agricultural Communications Scholarship," Journal of Applied Communications, 107 (1). https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2428

Urhahne, D., Wijnia, L. (2023). Theories of Motivation in Education: an Integrative Framework. Educ Psychol Rev, (35) 45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09767-9

Washburn, T., Essary, C., Irlbeck, E., Gibson, C.,; and Akers, C. (2022) "Foreseen Demands for Up-and-coming Science Communicators and Recommendations for Science Communication Training Programs," Journal of Applied Communications, 106(2). https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.2410

Weeks, B. E., Halversen, A., & Neubaum, G. (2024). Too scared to share? Fear of social sanctions for political expression on social media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 29(1),

White, J. M., Ochoa-Aviles, A., & Vásquez-Guevara, D. (2023). Methodological Alternatives that Promote Public Engagement for Science Communication. Science Communication and Public Engagement: Evolving Toward Science-Society Participation.

Wilcox, R.R. (2017). Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing. Academic Press.

Additional Files

Published

10/28/2025

How to Cite

Swenson, R., & Marson, C. (2025). Science Communication Training, Skills, and Importance Among Agricultural, Food, and Environmental Scientists. NACTA Journal, 69(1). https://doi.org/10.56103/nactaj.v69i1.222

Issue

Section

Manuscripts